Ricky Ashley v. Dexter Payne, et al
Tonya Parker, Sergeant, Saline County Jail, High, Detective, Saline County Jail, Jeremy Andrews, Warden, EARU, ADC, Richard Patterson, Deputy, Saline County Jail, Vince Shoptaw, Deputy Prosecutor, Saline County, Badmed, LPN, EARU, ADC, Spickard, LPN, Ouachita River Unit, ADC, Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Gary Arnold, Judge, Saline County Circuit Court and Howard, Sergeant, Saline County Jail |
Ricky Ashley |
20-1648 |
March 26, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
PETITION for enbanc rehearing and also for rehearing by panel filed by Appellant Mr. Ricky Ashley w/service 05/05/2020 [4912527] [20-1648] (JPP) [Entered: 05/12/2020 02:17 PM] |
MOTION for extension of time to file petition for rehearing until 05/08/2020, filed by Appellant Mr. Ricky Ashley filed by Party Mr. Ricky Ashley w/service 04/24/2020. [4906423] [20-1648] (JPP) [Entered: 04/24/2020 11:15 AM] |
CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 4906423-2 ] motion for extension of time to file rehearing filed by Mr. Ricky Ashley. Petition for Rehearing due on 05/08/2020 [4906425] [20-1648] (JPP) [Entered: 04/24/2020 11:18 AM] |
JUDGMENT FILED - Case dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. ; Denying as moot [ # 4900196-2 ] motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Mr. Ricky Ashley. The full $505.00 appellate filing and docketing fees are assessed against the appellant. The court remands the collection of those fees to the district court. DUANE BENTON, ROGER L. WOLLMAN and RALPH R. ERICKSON Adp Apr 2020 [4900968] [20-1648] (JPP) [Entered: 04/09/2020 12:45 PM] |
CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Duane Benton, Roger L. Wollman, Ralph R. Erickson in St. Louis [4900957] [20-1648] (JPP) [Entered: 04/09/2020 12:29 PM] |
MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Appellant Mr. Ricky Ashley w/service 04/07/2020. [4900196] [20-1648] (CMH) [Entered: 04/07/2020 04:44 PM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Proposed Findings & Recommendations dated 8/19/2019, Order and Judgment both dated 9/5/2019, and Text Order dated 3/26/2020. [4896157] [20-1648] (CMH) [Entered: 03/26/2020 04:26 PM] |
CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 04/23/2020, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [4896163] [20-1648] (CMH) [Entered: 03/26/2020 04:29 PM] |
CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [4896164] [20-1648] (CMH) [Entered: 03/26/2020 04:31 PM] |
Prisoner case docketed. [4896139] [20-1648] (CMH) [Entered: 03/26/2020 04:14 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.