Bernard Fraction v. Douglas Cty. Attorney's Office, et al
| Dennis Rookstool, Richard G Kopf, Director of Public Properties, Douglas County Treasurer's Office, Theresia M. Urich, Douglas County Attorney's Office, Tim Dolan and John W. Ewing, Jr., Treasurer |
| Bernard Fraction |
| 20-1665 |
| March 30, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Bernard Fraction v. Douglas Cty. Attorney's Office |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: If the original file of the U.S. District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by 8th Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with 8th Circuit Local Rule 30A (a)(2), the clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. BRIEF OF APPELLANT Bernard Fraction due 05/11/2020. [4897125] [20-1665] (CAH) [Entered: 03/30/2020 04:11 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, memorandum and order 2/26/20, judgment 2/26/20, memorandum & order 3/27/20. [4897123] [20-1665] (CAH) [Entered: 03/30/2020 04:10 PM] |
| Civil case docketed. [4897117] [20-1665] (CAH) [Entered: 03/30/2020 04:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
