United States v. Jose Ramirez-Martinez
| Jose Carlos Ramirez-Martinez |
| United States of America |
| 20-1702 |
| April 3, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 United States v. Ramirez-Martinez
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Originating court document filed consisting of originating court order of 04/09/2020 Granting IFP and Granting motion for appointment of Christopher Roth as CJA Counsel. [4900900] [20-1702] (AEV) [Entered: 04/09/2020 11:23 AM] |
| UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 20-1702: In Forma Pauperis] [4900902] [20-1702] (AEV) [Entered: 04/09/2020 11:24 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: The United States District court has granted appellant permission to proceed in forma pauperis, and his motion for appointment of counsel is granted. Mr. Christopher James Roth is appointed under the provisions of the Criminal Justice Act to represent appellant. Appellants opening brief is due May 15, 2020.[ # 4899555-2 ] [4900992] [20-1702] (NDW) [Entered: 04/09/2020 01:16 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:Appellants district court counsel has filed a motion for appointment of counsel. Appellant has not been granted in forma pauperis status, and the appeal and the motion for appointment will be held in abeyance for 21 days to permit appellant to file a properly-document motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis with the clerk of the Untied States District Court for the District of Nebraska. If such a motion is filed, the court will continue to hold the matter and the motion in abeyance pending the district courts ruling on the IFP motion. [4899818] [20-1702] (NDW) [Entered: 04/07/2020 09:25 AM] |
| MOTION for appointment of counsel, filed by Attorney Mr. Christopher James Roth for Appellant Mr. Jose Carlos Ramirez-Martinez w/service 04/06/2020. [4899555] [20-1702] (CJR) [Entered: 04/06/2020 02:36 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Judgment 4/1/20, docket entries, [4898992] [20-1702] (AEV) [Entered: 04/03/2020 02:08 PM] |
| CRIMINAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: PSI report due 04/23/2020. Transcript due 04/23/2020. Brief of appellant Jose Carlos Ramirez-Martinez due 05/07/2020. Appellee(s) brief is due 21 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellant(s) brief. Appellant reply brief is due 7 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellee's brief. [4898998] [20-1702] (AEV) [Entered: 04/03/2020 02:11 PM] |
| CRIMINAL case docketed. [4898972] [20-1702] (AEV) [Entered: 04/03/2020 01:45 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States v. Jose Ramirez-Martinez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: Jose Carlos Ramirez-Martinez | |
| Represented By: | Christopher James Roth |
| Represented By: | Jose Carlos Ramirez-Martinez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Shawn Wehde |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
