Arthur Carson v. Roger Lacy, et al
| Roger Lacy, doing business as D&B Janitorial Services, Anita Cotton, First Advantage Background Services Corporation, (Originally named as "Corporation Services Co."), D&B Janitorial Services and Laidlaw & Lacy Inc. |
| Arthur Carson |
| 20-1732 |
| April 8, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Paper copies Appellee/Respondent brief, [ # 4919419-2 ] filed by Ms. Anita Cotton, D&B Janitorial Services and Mr. Roger Lacy 10 paper copies received. [4920680] [20-1732] (NDW) [Entered: 06/05/2020 11:56 AM] |
| APPELLEE brief of Mr. Roger Lacy, Laidlaw & Lacy Inc., D&B Janitorial Services and Ms. Anita Cotton submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [4919252] [20-1732] (MMD) [Entered: 06/02/2020 11:36 AM] |
| Brief deficiency notice sent to counsel, Attorney Mr. Abtin Mehdizadegan for Appellees Mr. Roger Lacy, D&B Janitorial Services, Laidlaw & Lacy Inc. and Ms. Anita Cotton. [4919262] [20-1732] (LMT) [Entered: 06/02/2020 12:04 PM] |
| APPELLEE brief of Ms. Anita Cotton, D&B Janitorial Services, Mr. Roger Lacy and Laidlaw & Lacy Inc. submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [4919388] [20-1732] (MMD) [Entered: 06/02/2020 02:50 PM] |
| BRIEF FILED - APPELLEE BRIEF filed by Ms. Anita Cotton, D&B Janitorial Services, Mr. Roger Lacy and Laidlaw & Lacy Inc., w/service 06/02/2020 , Length: 9873 words Reply brief of Arthur Carson due on 06/23/2020. [4919419] [20-1732] (LMT) [Entered: 06/02/2020 03:16 PM] |
| Addendum of APPELLEE submitted for review by First Advantage Background Services Corporation. To open/view this addendum, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. [4918201] [20-1732]--[Edited 05/29/2020 by LMT] (JAS) [Entered: 05/29/2020 10:08 AM] |
| APPELLEE brief of First Advantage Background Services Corporation submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [4918196] [20-1732] (JAS) [Entered: 05/29/2020 10:05 AM] |
| Addendum deficiency notice sent to counsel, Attorney Mr. Jason A. Spak for Appellee First Advantage Background Services Corporation. New electronic copy of addendum due on 06/03/2020 [4918247] [20-1732] (LMT) [Entered: 05/29/2020 10:48 AM] |
| BRIEF FILED - APPELLEE BRIEF filed by First Advantage Background Services Corporation, w/service 05/29/2020 , Length: 13 pages [4918309] [20-1732] (LMT) [Entered: 05/29/2020 11:59 AM] |
| Addendum of APPELLEE submitted for review by First Advantage Background Services Corporation. To open/view this addendum, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. [4918271] [20-1732]--[Edited 05/29/2020 by LMT] (JAS) [Entered: 05/29/2020 11:18 AM] |
| ADDENDUM of APPELLEE FILED by Appellee First Advantage Background Services Corporation , w/service 05/29/2020 [4918308] [20-1732] (LMT) [Entered: 05/29/2020 11:54 AM] |
| Brief deficiency notice sent to counsel, Attorney Mr. Jason A. Spak for Appellee First Advantage Background Services Corporation. [4917881] [20-1732] (LMT) [Entered: 05/28/2020 02:45 PM] |
| Addendum deficiency notice sent to counsel, Attorney Mr. Jason A. Spak for Appellee First Advantage Background Services Corporation. New electronic copy of addendum due on 06/02/2020 [4917859] [20-1732] (LMT) [Entered: 05/28/2020 02:33 PM] |
| Addendum of APPELLEE submitted for review by First Advantage Background Services Corporation. To open/view this addendum, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. [4917737] [20-1732]--[Edited 05/28/2020 by LMT] (JAS) [Entered: 05/28/2020 12:51 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Jason A. Spak for Appellee First Advantage Background Services Corporation w/service 05/28/2020 [4917726] [20-1732] (JAS) [Entered: 05/28/2020 12:23 PM] |
| CORPORATE disclosure statement filed by Appellee First Advantage Background Services Corporation. - FOR CAL [4917727] [20-1732] (JAS) [Entered: 05/28/2020 12:24 PM] |
| APPELLEE brief of First Advantage Background Services Corporation submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [4917735] [20-1732] (JAS) [Entered: 05/28/2020 12:50 PM] |
| CORPORATE disclosure statement filed by Appellee D&B Janitorial Services. - FOR CAL [4917216] [20-1732] (AM) [Entered: 05/27/2020 01:49 PM] |
| BRIEF FILED -PRO SE APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. Arthur Carson. w/service by USCA8 05/05/2020 , Length: 13 pages, 5 copies Brief of Anita Cotton, D&B Janitorial Services, First Advantage Background Services Corporation, Roger Lacy and Laidlaw & Lacy Inc. due on 06/03/2020 [4910007] [20-1732] (CRJ) [Entered: 05/05/2020 02:09 PM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Appellant Mr. Arthur Carson w/service 04/27/2020. [4906964] [20-1732] (CAH) [Entered: 04/27/2020 01:08 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:Appellant has already been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, appellant's motion for leave to proceed ifp is denied as moot.. [ # 4906964-2 ] . [4906969] [20-1732] (CAH) [Entered: 04/27/2020 01:11 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Abtin Mehdizadegan for Appellees Ms. Anita Cotton, D&B Janitorial Services, Mr. Roger Lacy and Laidlaw & Lacy Inc. w/service 04/09/2020 [4900887] [20-1732] (AM) [Entered: 04/09/2020 11:03 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Missy McJunkins Duke for Appellees Ms. Anita Cotton, D&B Janitorial Services, Mr. Roger Lacy and Laidlaw & Lacy Inc. w/service 04/09/2020 [4900896] [20-1732] (MMD) [Entered: 04/09/2020 11:09 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, order 4/1/20, judgment 4/1/20. [4900297] [20-1732] (CAH) [Entered: 04/08/2020 09:42 AM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: If the original file of the U.S. District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by 8th Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with 8th Circuit Local Rule 30A (a)(2), the clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. BRIEF OF APPELLANT Arthur Carson due 05/18/2020. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [4900299] [20-1732] (CAH) [Entered: 04/08/2020 09:43 AM] |
| Civil case docketed. [4900293] [20-1732] (CAH) [Entered: 04/08/2020 09:38 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
