David John Asmussen v. Warden Darin Young, et al
| Warden Darin Young and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota |
| David John Asmussen |
| 20-1885 |
| April 29, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed by Appellant Mr. David John Asmussen w/service 05/27/2020. [4917170] [20-1885] (CYZ) [Entered: 05/27/2020 12:48 PM] |
| Tendered Motion to proceed IFP received from Appellant Mr. David John Asmussen [4916416] [20-1885] (AMT) [Entered: 05/26/2020 01:00 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of order dated 05/14/2020 denying motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, [4913327] [20-1885] (CYZ) [Entered: 05/14/2020 11:52 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 06/11/2020, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [4913331] [20-1885] (CYZ) [Entered: 05/14/2020 11:54 AM] |
| MEMORANDUM of Appellant Mr. David John Asmussen in support of Application for certificate of appealability, filed by Mr. David John Asmussen in 20-1885 , Doc No. [ # 4909739-2 ]. w/service 05/05/2020. [4909743] [20-1885] (CYZ) [Entered: 05/05/2020 09:25 AM] |
| APPLICATION for Certificate of Appealability, filed by Appellant Mr. David John Asmussen w/service 05/05/2020 [4909739] [20-1885] (CYZ) [Entered: 05/05/2020 09:19 AM] |
| Tendered Affidavit in Support of COA received from Appellant Mr. David John Asmussen w/service 04/29/2020 [4909379] [20-1885] (AEV) [Entered: 05/04/2020 12:20 PM] |
| Tendered Request for COA received from Appellant Mr. David John Asmussen w/service 04/27/2020 [4909376] [20-1885] (AEV) [Entered: 05/04/2020 12:19 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of docket entries, order of 3/26/2020, judgment of 3/26/2020, order denying motion for reconsideration dated 4/20/2020, notice of appeal [4908046] [20-1885] (CYZ) [Entered: 04/29/2020 03:36 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [4908050] [20-1885] (CYZ) [Entered: 04/29/2020 03:37 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within 21 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 05/20/2020, a show cause order will be entered directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. [4908053] [20-1885] (CYZ) [Entered: 04/29/2020 03:41 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [4908036] [20-1885] (CYZ) [Entered: 04/29/2020 03:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
