R. Henson v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: R. Henson
Defendant / Appellee: Foster B. McDaniel and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Case Number: 20-1966
Filed: May 12, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 8, 2021 Summary Henson v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 10, 2020 MOTION for extension of time to file brief until 07/27/2020, filed by Attorney Mr. Mark Alan Buchanan for Appellant R. Henson w/service 07/10/2020. [4932293] [20-1966] (MAB) [Entered: 07/10/2020 10:19 AM]
July 10, 2020 CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 4932293-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Mr. Mark Alan Buchanan. Brief of R. Henson due 07/27/2020. Appendix due on 07/27/2020 [4932444] [20-1966] (MDS) [Entered: 07/10/2020 01:20 PM]
June 22, 2020 MOTION for extension of time to file brief until 07/13/2020, filed by Attorney Mr. Mark Alan Buchanan for Appellant R. Henson w/service 06/22/2020. [4925724] [20-1966] (MAB) [Entered: 06/22/2020 08:11 AM]
June 22, 2020 On December 1, 2016, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure were amended to require a certificate of compliance for motions filed under Rule 27, certifying that the document complies with the type-volume limitations and stating the number of words in the document. Your recently filed motion did not contain this certificate of compliance. No action will be taken on your motion for extension of time to file brief, [ # 4925724-2 ], submitted by Mr. Mark Alan Buchanan in 20-1966, pending the filing of a certificate of compliance using the 'Certificate of Compliance' event. Please do not refile your motion [20-1966] (MDS) [Entered: 06/22/2020 09:36 AM]
June 22, 2020 CLERK ORDER: Granting [ # 4925724-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Mr. Mark Alan Buchanan. Brief of R. Henson due 07/13/2020. Appendix due on 07/13/2020. [4926140] [20-1966] (MDS) [Entered: 06/22/2020 04:28 PM]
June 22, 2020 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE filed by Attorney Mr. Mark Alan Buchanan for Appellant R. Henson correcting [ # 4925724-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Attorney. [4926052] [20-1966] (MAB) [Entered: 06/22/2020 02:56 PM]
June 3, 2020 METHOD of appendix preparation filed by Appellant R. Henson - Separate Appendix - w/service 06/03/2020 [4919938] [20-1966] (MAB) [Entered: 06/03/2020 07:29 PM]
June 2, 2020 APPEARANCE filed by Mark A. Buchanan for Appellant R. Henson w/service 06/02/2020 [4919445] [20-1966] (MAB) [Entered: 06/02/2020 03:58 PM]
May 26, 2020 APPEARANCE filed by C. Kevin Baldwin for Appellant R. Henson w/service 05/26/2020 [4916249] [20-1966] (CKB) [Entered: 05/26/2020 10:17 AM]
May 26, 2020 APPEARANCE filed by Eric Vernon for Appellant R. Henson w/service 05/26/2020 [4916239] [20-1966] (EEV) [Entered: 05/26/2020 10:03 AM]
May 19, 2020 APPEARANCE filed by R. Evan Jarrold for Appellees Foster B. McDaniel and Union Pacific Railroad Company w/service 05/19/2020 [4914778] [20-1966] (REJ) [Entered: 05/19/2020 01:49 PM]
May 19, 2020 APPEARANCE filed by Robert L. Ortbals, Jr. for Appellees Foster B. McDaniel and Union Pacific Railroad Company w/service 05/19/2020 [4914782] [20-1966] (RLO) [Entered: 05/19/2020 01:53 PM]
May 19, 2020 CORPORATE disclosure statement filed by Appellee Union Pacific Railroad Company. - FOR CAL [4914786] [20-1966] (REJ) [Entered: 05/19/2020 01:56 PM]
May 12, 2020 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Order 4/3/19, Order 7/15/19, Order 4/21/20, Judgment 4/21/20, docket entries, [4912550] [20-1966] (AEV) [Entered: 05/12/2020 02:42 PM]
May 12, 2020 BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Appendix due on 06/22/2020. BRIEF OF APPELLANT R. Henson due 06/22/2020. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [4912554] [20-1966] (AEV) [Entered: 05/12/2020 02:43 PM]
May 12, 2020 Civil case docketed. [4912548] [20-1966] (AEV) [Entered: 05/12/2020 02:39 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: R. Henson v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: R. Henson
Represented By: C. Kevin Baldwin
Represented By: Sylvia Alejandra Hernandez
Represented By: Eric E. Vernon
Represented By: Mark Alan Buchanan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Foster B. McDaniel
Represented By: Donald Sony Prophete
Represented By: R. Evan Jarrold
Represented By: Robert Lee Ortbals Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Represented By: Donald Sony Prophete
Represented By: R. Evan Jarrold
Represented By: Robert Lee Ortbals Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?