Robert Sommerfeld, et al v. Adesta, LLC
| Robert Sommerfeld, Gregory Benak and James Kawamoto |
| Adesta, LLC |
| 20-2046 |
| May 27, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE filed by Thomas J. Culhane for Appellants Mr. Gregory Benak, Mr. James Kawamoto and Mr. Robert Sommerfeld w/service 05/28/2020 [4917666] [20-2046] (TJC) [Entered: 05/28/2020 11:08 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Nicholas F. Sullivan for Appellants Mr. Gregory Benak, Mr. James Kawamoto and Mr. Robert Sommerfeld w/service 05/28/2020 [4917723] [20-2046] (NFS) [Entered: 05/28/2020 12:20 PM] |
| CORPORATE disclosure statement filed by Appellee Adesta. - FOR CAL [4917618] [20-2046] (RMA) [Entered: 05/28/2020 10:38 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Robert M. Andalman for Appellee Adesta w/service 05/27/2020 [4917280] [20-2046] (RMA) [Entered: 05/27/2020 02:41 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Memorandum & Order and Judgment both dated 4/28/2020. [4917009] [20-2046] (CMH) [Entered: 05/27/2020 10:41 AM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Appendix due on 07/06/2020. BRIEF OF APPELLANT Gregory Benak, James Kawamoto and Robert Sommerfeld due 07/06/2020. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [4917010] [20-2046] (CMH) [Entered: 05/27/2020 10:41 AM] |
| Civil case docketed. [4917000] [20-2046] (CMH) [Entered: 05/27/2020 10:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
