Pete Wright v. Vernon County Sheriff's Office, et al
| Vernon County Sheriff's Office and Jason Mosher, Sheriff |
| Pete Wright |
| 20-2148 |
| June 9, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MANDATE ISSUED. [4977522] [20-2148] (AMT) [Entered: 11/19/2020 02:40 PM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - Granting [ # 4925881-2 ] motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Mr. Pete Wright. The full $505.00 appellate filing and docketing fees are assessed against the appellant. Appellant may pay the filing fee in installments in accordance with 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b). The court remands the collection of those fees to the district court. , This case is summarily affirmed in accordance with Eighth Circuit Rule 47A. JAMES B. LOKEN, STEVEN M. COLLOTON and DUANE BENTON Adp Oct 2020 [4969455] [20-2148] [20-2148]--[Edited 10/26/2020 by JPP - Reason: THIS JUDGMENT HAS BEE REPLACED BY CORRECTED JUDGMENT ENTERED 10/26/20.] (JPP) [Entered: 10/26/2020 01:14 PM] |
| CORRECTED JUDGMENT Filed - Correcting this court's judgment of 10/26/2020, document number [4969455-2], document number [4969455-3] ) [4969595] [20-2148] Appellant's motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is granted. This case is summarily afirmed in accordance with Eighth Circuit Rule 47A. This court has reviewed the original file of the United States District Court. It is ordered by the court that the judgment of the district court is summarily affirmed. See Eighth Circuit Rule 47A(a). (JPP) [Entered: 10/26/2020 03:47 PM] |
| UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 20-2148: In Forma Pauperis] [4969619] [20-2148] (JPP) [Entered: 10/26/2020 03:59 PM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges James B. Loken, Steven M. Colloton, Duane Benton in St. Louis [4969443] [20-2148] (JPP) [Entered: 10/26/2020 12:43 PM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Appellant Mr. Pete Wright w/service 06/22/2020. [4925881] [20-2148] (CMH) [Entered: 06/22/2020 11:21 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order and Judgment both dated 2/22/2019, Order dated 4/29, 2019, Order and Judgment both dated 4/28/2020, Order dated 5/19/2020 and Order dated 6/8/2020. [4921717] [20-2148] (CMH) [Entered: 06/09/2020 10:44 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 07/07/2020, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [4921729] [20-2148] (CMH) [Entered: 06/09/2020 10:50 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [4921735] [20-2148] (CMH) [Entered: 06/09/2020 10:59 AM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [4921708] [20-2148] (CMH) [Entered: 06/09/2020 10:38 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
