Otis McAllister v. United States
Petitioner: Otis McAllister
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 20-2189
Filed: June 15, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 15, 2020 MOTION for Permission to file a Successive Habeas Petition (Rec'd by MAIL) with proposed memo pursuant to 28 USC 2255 attached, filed by Petitioner Mr. Otis McAllister w/service 06/15/2020. [4923661] [20-2189] (AEV) [Entered: 06/15/2020 11:21 AM]
June 15, 2020 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [4923659] [20-2189] (AEV) [Entered: 06/15/2020 11:12 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Otis McAllister v. United States
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Tiffany Gulley Becker
Represented By: Allison Hart Behrens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Otis McAllister
Represented By: Otis McAllister
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?