Charles Johnson v. United States
| Charles L. Johnson |
| United States of America |
| 20-2208 |
| June 17, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION for Permission to file a Successive Habeas Petition (Electronic), filed by Attorney Mr. Daniel Goldberg for Petitioner Mr. Charles L. Johnson w/service 06/17/2020. [4924575] [20-2208] (CMH) [Entered: 06/17/2020 11:30 AM] |
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [4924526] [20-2208] (CMH) [Entered: 06/17/2020 10:40 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Charles Johnson v. United States | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | David A. Barnes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Charles L. Johnson | |
| Represented By: | Charles L. Johnson |
| Represented By: | Daniel Goldberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
