Randy Rindahl v. U.S. Attorney's Office for MN
Defendant / Appellee: United States Attorney's Office, for Minnesota
Plaintiff / Appellant: Randy Rindahl
Case Number: 20-2311
Filed: June 29, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 18, 2020 JUDGMENT FILED - Appellant has failed to respond to the show cause order and the time for a response has expired. This appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Mandate shall issue forthwith., The full $505 appellate and docketing fees are assessed against the appellant. The court remands the collection of those fees to the district court. [4946263] [20-2311] (NDW) [Entered: 08/18/2020 10:36 AM]
August 18, 2020 MANDATE ISSUED. [4946276] [20-2311] (NDW) [Entered: 08/18/2020 10:53 AM]
June 29, 2020 CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [4928379] [20-2311] (CBO) [Entered: 06/29/2020 12:42 PM]
June 29, 2020 CLERK ORDER:The district Court has determined that Appellant has three strikes under 28 U.S.C Section 1915(g). Accordingly, Appellant may not proceed in this appeal without first paying the full appellate docketing fee. Appellant is directed to pay to the district court the appellate docketing fee of $505, or to file a pleading in this court explaining why Appellant is eligible to proceed without pre-payment of the fee. If appellant fails to either pay the fee or respond to this order within 30 days of the date of this order, the appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Compliance is due 07/29/2020 [4928377] [20-2311] (CBO) [Entered: 06/29/2020 12:38 PM]
June 29, 2020 Originating court document filed consisting of docket entries, report and recommendation filed 2/11/2020, order adopting r&r filed 4/1/2020, judgment filed 4/3/2020, notice of appeal filed 4/21/2020, and order denying IFP filed 6/24/2020. [4928370] [20-2311] (CBO) [Entered: 06/29/2020 12:32 PM]
June 29, 2020 Prisoner case docketed. [4928361] [20-2311] (CBO) [Entered: 06/29/2020 12:11 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Randy Rindahl v. U.S. Attorney's Office for MN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: United States Attorney's Office, for Minnesota
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Randy Rindahl
Represented By: Randy Rindahl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?