Guadalupe Barrera Arreguin, et al v. William P. Barr
| Guadalupe Barrera Arreguin, Arcenio Hinojoza Barrera and Magaly Hinojoza Berrera |
| William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States |
| 20-2431 |
| July 14, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Guadalupe Barrera Arreguin v. Merrick B. Garland
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE filed by Genevieve M. Kelly for Respondent Mr. William P. Barr w/service 07/16/2020 [4934360] [20-2431] (GK) [Entered: 07/16/2020 10:38 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Kelly M Hewitt for Petitioners Ms. Guadalupe Barrera Arreguin, Mr. Arcenio Hinojoza Barrera and Ms. Magaly Hinojoza Berrera w/service 07/15/2020 [4933880] [20-2431] (KMH) [Entered: 07/15/2020 09:35 AM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Administrative Record due 08/24/2020. Appendix due on 09/08/2020. Brief of Guadalupe Barrera Arreguin, Arcenio Hinojoza Barrera and Magaly Hinojoza Berrera due on 09/08/2020. Responsive brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief.[4933775] [20-2431] (CMH) [Entered: 07/14/2020 05:09 PM] |
| PETITION for Review of an order of the Board of Immigration of Appeals (Rec'd by MAIL) filed by Petitioners Ms. Guadalupe Barrera Arreguin, Mr. Arcenio Hinojoza Barrera and Ms. Magaly Hinojoza Berrera w/service 07/14/2020. [4933773] [20-2431] (CMH) [Entered: 07/14/2020 05:02 PM] |
| Agency case docketed [4933756] [20-2431] (CMH) [Entered: 07/14/2020 04:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
