Randy Cowherd v. Mike Leidholt
Defendant / Appellee: Mike Leidholt, Secretary of Corrections
Plaintiff / Appellant: Randy Cowherd
Case Number: 20-2777
Filed: August 25, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 22, 2020 JUDGMENT FILED - Appellant has failed to respond to the show cause order and the time for a response has expired. This appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Mandate shall issue forthwith., The full $505 appellate and docketing fees are assessed against the appellant. The court remands the collection of those fees to the district court. [4968319] [20-2777] (CRJ) [Entered: 10/22/2020 11:14 AM]
October 22, 2020 MANDATE ISSUED. [4968334] [20-2777] (CRJ) [Entered: 10/22/2020 11:22 AM]
October 5, 2020 CLERK ORDER:APPELLANT has failed to pay to the Clerk of the District Court the requisite docketing fees. APPELLANT is directed to show cause within 14 days why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Response of Randy Cowherd due 10/19/2020 [4962350] [20-2777] (MMH) [Entered: 10/05/2020 01:35 PM]
August 26, 2020 CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [4949519] [20-2777] (MMH) [Entered: 08/26/2020 11:33 AM]
August 26, 2020 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, and Order 3/13/20. NOTE: This is an interlocutory appeal. [4949510] [20-2777] (MMH) [Entered: 08/26/2020 11:25 AM]
August 26, 2020 CLERK ORDER: Appellant is directed to pay the $505.00 filing fee to the district court or renew his application for leave to appeal in forma pauperis with complete & current financial documentation with the Court of Appeals. If appellant fails to do this, the appeal will be dismissed. Docket fee is to be paid to the district court by September 23, 2020. [4949513] [20-2777] (MMH) [Entered: 08/26/2020 11:30 AM]
August 26, 2020 Prisoner case docketed. [4949503] [20-2777] (MMH) [Entered: 08/26/2020 11:16 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Randy Cowherd v. Mike Leidholt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Mike Leidholt, Secretary of Corrections
Represented By: Jeffery J. Tronvold
Represented By: Caroline Anne Srstka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Randy Cowherd
Represented By: Randy Cowherd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?