United States, et al v. Daikin Applied Americas, et al
| Housing and Redevelopment Authority of City of St. Louis Park, Rustic Oaks Condominium, Inc., Oak Park Village Associates, Reilly Tar and Chemical Corporation and Philips Investment Co. |
| State of Minnesota, by its Attorney General Hubert H. Humphrey, III, its Department of Health and its Pollution Control Agency, City of St. Louis Park, City of Hopkins and United States of America |
| Super Radiator Coils and Daikin Applied Americas Inc. |
| 20-2786 |
| August 26, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 United States v. Daikin Applied Americas
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Paper copies Appellant/Petitioner Brief, [ # 4965869-2 ] filed by Daikin Applied Americas Inc. and Super Radiator Coils 10 paper copies received. w/Addendum attached [4967093] [20-2786] (AMT) [Entered: 10/19/2020 03:41 PM] |
| RECORD FILED - APLNT/PET APPENDIX, 2 volumes, Comments: 3 Sets [4967097] [20-2786] (AMT) [Entered: 10/19/2020 03:44 PM] |
| APPELLANT brief of Daikin Applied Americas Inc. and Super Radiator Coils submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [4965735] [20-2786] (MAS) [Entered: 10/15/2020 10:04 AM] |
| BRIEF FILED - APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Daikin Applied Americas Inc. and Super Radiator Coils. w/service 10/15/2020 , Length: 11,461 words 10 COPIES OF PAPER BRIEFS (WITHOUT THE APPELLATE PDF FOOTER) FROM Daikin Applied Americas Inc. and Super Radiator Coils due 10/20/2020 WITH certificate of service for paper briefs. Brief of City of Hopkins, City of St. Louis Park, State of Minnesota and United States of America due on 11/16/2020 [4965869] [20-2786] (CRJ) [Entered: 10/15/2020 12:03 PM] |
| Addendum of APPELLANT submitted for review by Daikin Applied Americas Inc. and Super Radiator Coils. To open/view this addendum, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. [4965739] [20-2786] (MAS) [Entered: 10/15/2020 10:07 AM] |
| ADDENDUM of APPELLANT FILED by Appellants Daikin Applied Americas Inc. and Super Radiator Coils , w/service 10/15/2020 [4965873] [20-2786] (CRJ) [Entered: 10/15/2020 12:05 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Katelin Shugart-Schmidt for Appellee United States of America w/service 10/13/2020 [4964826] [20-2786] (KS) [Entered: 10/13/2020 11:41 AM] |
| CORPORATE disclosure statement filed by Appellant Super Radiator Coils. - FOR CAL [4954676] [20-2786] (NAB) [Entered: 09/11/2020 09:32 AM] |
| Certificate of transcript filed by Appellants Daikin Applied Americas Inc. and Super Radiator Coils. Transcript ordered Transcript previously ordered, paid for and filed. No additional transcripts. [4953799] [20-2786] (MAS) [Entered: 09/09/2020 10:54 AM] |
| DESIGNATION of record filed by Appellants Daikin Applied Americas Inc. and Super Radiator Coils. w/service 09/09/2020 [4953975] [20-2786] (MAS) [Entered: 09/09/2020 02:58 PM] |
| STATEMENT of issues filed by Appellants Daikin Applied Americas Inc. and Super Radiator Coils - w/service 09/09/2020. [4954095] [20-2786] (MAS) [Entered: 09/09/2020 04:37 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Thomas D. Lupo for Appellant Daikin Applied Americas Inc. w/service 09/04/2020 [4952899] [20-2786] (TDL) [Entered: 09/04/2020 03:37 PM] |
| METHOD of appendix preparation filed by Appellants Daikin Applied Americas Inc. and Super Radiator Coils - Separate Appendix - w/service 09/03/2020 [4952519] [20-2786] (MAS) [Entered: 09/03/2020 04:12 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Charles B. Rogers for Appellant Daikin Applied Americas Inc. w/service 08/31/2020 [4950731] [20-2786] (CBR) [Entered: 08/31/2020 08:11 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Stacey W. Person for Appellee State of Minnesota w/service 08/31/2020 [4950897] [20-2786] (SWP) [Entered: 08/31/2020 11:19 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Nancy Q. Burke for Appellant Super Radiator Coils w/service 08/31/2020 [4951270] [20-2786] (NAB) [Entered: 08/31/2020 05:01 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Harvey M. Sheldon for Appellant Daikin Applied Americas Inc. w/service 08/28/2020 [4950703] [20-2786] (HMS) [Entered: 08/28/2020 05:14 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Charles N. Nauen for Appellee City of St. Louis Park w/service 08/27/2020 [4950014] [20-2786] (CNN) [Entered: 08/27/2020 01:11 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by David J. Zoll for Appellee City of St. Louis Park w/service 08/27/2020 [4950016] [20-2786] (DJZ) [Entered: 08/27/2020 01:13 PM] |
| CORPORATE disclosure statement filed by Appellant Daikin Applied Americas Inc.. - FOR CAL [4950022] [20-2786] (MAS) [Entered: 08/27/2020 01:20 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by M. Annie Santos for Appellant Daikin Applied Americas Inc. w/service 08/27/2020 [4950019] [20-2786] (MAS) [Entered: 08/27/2020 01:16 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, and Memo and Order 7/23/20 [4949690] [20-2786] (MMH) [Entered: 08/26/2020 03:20 PM] |
| Civil case docketed. [4949673] [20-2786] (MMH) [Entered: 08/26/2020 03:06 PM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on or before 10/05/2020. Appendix due 10/15/2020. BRIEF APPELLANT, Daikin Applied Americas Inc. and Super Radiator Coils due 10/15/2020 Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [4949694] [20-2786] (MMH) [Entered: 08/26/2020 03:22 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
