Nathan Braun v. Paul Schnell, et al
| Thomas Wayne Evenstad |
| Vicki Janssen, Paul Schnell, Michelle Smith, Jesse Pugh, Minnesota Department of Corrections, Nate Knutson, Karen Robinson and State of Minnesota |
| Nathan Christopher Braun |
| 20-3008 |
| September 28, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Originating court document filed consisting of order dated 10/16/2020 directing the plaintiff to file a motion for IFP with the district court within 21 days. [4970735] [20-3008] (CYZ) [Entered: 10/29/2020 08:17 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Corinne Wright-MacLeod for Appellees Ms. Vicki Janssen, Mr. Nate Knutson, MNDOC, Jesse Pugh, Ms. Karen Robinson, Mr. Paul Schnell and Ms. Michelle Smith w/service 10/21/2020 [4967909] [20-3008] (CW) [Entered: 10/21/2020 12:03 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Kevin Jonassen for Appellees Ms. Vicki Janssen, Mr. Nate Knutson, MNDOC, Jesse Pugh, Ms. Karen Robinson, Mr. Paul Schnell and Ms. Michelle Smith w/service 10/15/2020 [4965948] [20-3008] (KJ) [Entered: 10/15/2020 01:37 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:for limited remand This case is remanded to the district court for the limited purpose of determining the appellant's IFP status and assessment of the docketing fees pursuant to 28 USC Section 1915 as amended by PLRA. [4960121] [20-3008] (CYZ) [Entered: 09/28/2020 11:49 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, order of 9/14/2020, judgment of 9/15/2020 [4960117] [20-3008] (CYZ) [Entered: 09/28/2020 11:44 AM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [4960094] [20-3008] (CYZ) [Entered: 09/28/2020 11:24 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
