Billy Bellamy v. Cindy Griffith
| Billy Joe Bellamy |
| Cindy Griffith |
| 20-3015 |
| September 28, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE filed by Evan M. Rodriguez for Respondent Ms. Cindy Griffith w/service 09/29/2020 [4960841] [20-3015] (ER) [Entered: 09/29/2020 03:36 PM] |
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [4960267] [20-3015] (CAH) [Entered: 09/28/2020 02:25 PM] |
| MOTION for Permission to file a Successive Habeas Petition (Rec'd by MAIL), filed by Petitioner Mr. Billy Joe Bellamy w/service 09/28/2020. [4960270] [20-3015] (CAH) [Entered: 09/28/2020 02:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Billy Bellamy v. Cindy Griffith | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Billy Joe Bellamy | |
| Represented By: | Billy Joe Bellamy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Cindy Griffith | |
| Represented By: | Michael Joseph Spillane |
| Represented By: | Evan Rodriguez |
| Represented By: | Stephen David Hawke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
