Lisa Macon v. Arkansas Workers Compensation
| Arkansas Workers Compensation Commission |
| Lisa Macon |
| 20-3364 |
| November 12, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Lisa Macon v. Arkansas Workers Compensation |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| BRIEF FILED - APPELLEE BRIEF filed by Arkansas Workers Compensation Commission, w/service 01/08/2021. Length: 5,807 words. 10 COPIES OF PAPER BRIEFS (WITHOUT THE APPELLATE PDF FOOTER) FROM Arkansas Workers Compensation Commission due 01/13/2021 WITH certificate of service for paper briefs. Appellant's reply brief deadline will be set, based on the Certificate of Service in appellee's paper brief. [4992309] [20-3364] (HAG) [Entered: 01/08/2021 08:39 AM] |
| APPELLEE brief of Arkansas Workers Compensation Commission submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [4992275] [20-3364] (KH) [Entered: 01/07/2021 11:50 PM] |
| BRIEF FILED -PRO SE APPELLANT BRIEF WITH ADDENDUM filed by Ms. Lisa Macon, w/service 12/08/2020. Length: 4,332 words; Copies: 5 Brief of Arkansas Workers Compensation Commission due on 01/07/2021. [4983037] [20-3364] (HAG) [Entered: 12/08/2020 01:04 PM] |
| Civil case docketed. [4974868] [20-3364] (CMH) [Entered: 11/12/2020 09:30 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order and Judgment both dated 10/30/2020, and Order dated 11/10/2020. [4974883] [20-3364] (CMH) [Entered: 11/12/2020 09:49 AM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: If the original file of the U.S. District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by 8th Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with 8th Circuit Local Rule 30A (a)(2), the clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. BRIEF OF APPELLANT Lisa Macon due 12/22/2020. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [4974914] [20-3364] (CMH) [Entered: 11/12/2020 10:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Lisa Macon v. Arkansas Workers Compensation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Arkansas Workers Compensation Commission | |
| Represented By: | KaTina Hodge-Guest |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Lisa Macon | |
| Represented By: | Lisa Macon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
