Thomas Hansen v. Mike Heinricy
| Thomas Lee Hansen |
| Mike Heinricy, Warden/IMMC |
| 20-3480 |
| November 30, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION Issuance of Certificate of Appealability, filed by Attorney Mr. Steven Paul DeVolder for Appellant Mr. Thomas Lee Hansen w/service 12/14/2020. [4984552] [20-3480] (SPD) [Entered: 12/14/2020 09:28 AM] |
| UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 20-3480: paid - cs] [4981176] [20-3480] (CAH) [Entered: 12/02/2020 02:00 PM] |
| CLERK LETTER sent regarding payment of docketing fee. Case to be referred to court for review of certificate of appealability. [4981183] [20-3480] (CAH) [Entered: 12/02/2020 02:06 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Steven Paul DeVolder for Appellant Mr. Thomas Lee Hansen w/service 12/01/2020 [4980372] [20-3480] (SPD) [Entered: 12/01/2020 09:20 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Benjamin Parrott for Appellee Mike Heinricy w/service 11/30/2020 [4979949] [20-3480] (BMP) [Entered: 11/30/2020 12:35 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, R&R 10/9/20, order 10/29/20, judgment 10/30/20. [4979927] [20-3480] (CAH) [Entered: 11/30/2020 12:05 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within 21 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 12/21/2020, a show cause order will be entered directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. [4979929] [20-3480] (CAH) [Entered: 11/30/2020 12:06 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [4979932] [20-3480] (CAH) [Entered: 11/30/2020 12:09 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [4979925] [20-3480] (CAH) [Entered: 11/30/2020 12:01 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Thomas Hansen v. Mike Heinricy | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Thomas Lee Hansen | |
| Represented By: | Steven Paul DeVolder |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: Mike Heinricy, Warden/IMMC | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Milton Parrott |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
