Ricky Ashley v. Does
| Does, All Attorneys Licensed in Arkansas |
| Ricky Ashley |
| 20-3544 |
| December 7, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| RESPONSE in opposition to clerk order pay full filing fee [ # 4982747-2 ], filed by Appellant Mr. Ricky Ashley , w/service 12/30/2020. [4989860] [20-3544] (CMH) [Entered: 12/30/2020 03:26 PM] |
| UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 20-3544: pending] [4989878] [20-3544] (CMH) [Entered: 12/30/2020 03:46 PM] |
| MOTION for entry of Summary Judgment.under Rule 56(a), filed by Appellant Mr. Ricky Ashley in 20-3544, 20-3558 w/service 12/21/2020. [4987272] [20-3544, 20-3558] (CMH) [Entered: 12/21/2020 04:28 PM] |
| CLERK LETTER sent regarding to Appellant Mr. Ricky Ashley regarding using the correct caption and case number on all future filings with this court. [4987275] [20-3544] (CMH) [Entered: 12/21/2020 04:31 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [4982723] [20-3544] (CMH) [Entered: 12/07/2020 04:34 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Judgment both dated 6/10/2020 and Order dated 10/23/2020, Order dated 12/7/2020. [4982744] [20-3544] (CMH) [Entered: 12/07/2020 05:09 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: The district Court has determined that Appellant has three strikes under 28 U.S.C Section 1915(g). Accordingly, Appellant may not proceed in this appeal without first paying the full appellate docketing fee. Appellant is directed to pay to the district court the appellate docketing fee of $505, or to file a pleading in this court explaining why Appellant is eligible to proceed without pre-payment of the fee. If appellant fails to either pay the fee or respond to this order within 30 days of the date of this order, the appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Compliance is due 01/06/2021. [4982747] [20-3544] (CMH) [Entered: 12/07/2020 05:12 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [4982748] [20-3544] (CMH) [Entered: 12/07/2020 05:13 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Ricky Ashley v. Does | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Does, All Attorneys Licensed in Arkansas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Ricky Ashley | |
| Represented By: | Ricky Ashley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
