Daniel Hicks v. James McKinney
Respondent / Appellee: James McKinney
Petitioner / Appellant: Daniel Louis Hicks
Case Number: 21-1020
Filed: January 5, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2021 MEMORANDUM in support of Application for certificate of appealability, filed by Mr. Daniel Louis Hicks in 21-1020 , Doc No. [ # 4996180-2 ]. w/service 01/28/2021. [4999112] [21-1020] (AEV) [Entered: 01/28/2021 04:02 PM]
January 20, 2021 APPLICATION for Certificate of Appealability, filed by Appellant Mr. Daniel Louis Hicks w/service 01/20/2021 [4996180] [21-1020] (AJD) [Entered: 01/20/2021 03:10 PM]
January 20, 2021 Originating court document filed consisting of originating court order of 01/15/2021 Denying COA, [4996253] [21-1020] (AEV) [Entered: 01/20/2021 04:21 PM]
January 11, 2021 APPEARANCE filed by Andrew Dunn for Appellant Mr. Daniel Louis Hicks w/service 01/11/2021 [4992756] [21-1020] (Event is edited by replacing document)--[Edited 01/11/2021 by CMD] (AJD) [Entered: 01/11/2021 09:25 AM]
January 5, 2021 APPEARANCE filed by Benjamin Parrott for Appellee James McKinney w/service 01/05/2021 [4991191] [21-1020] (BMP) [Entered: 01/05/2021 02:48 PM]
January 5, 2021 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Order 7/10/20, Order 7/23/20, Order 8/31/20, docket entries, [4991175] [21-1020] (AEV) [Entered: 01/05/2021 02:29 PM]
January 5, 2021 CLERK ORDER:for limited remand-- This case is remanded in light of Tiedeman v. Benson, 122 F.3d 518 (8th Cir. 1997) with directions that if granted, the certificate of appealability specify the issue or issues that are to be considered on appeal. [4991178] [21-1020] (AEV) [Entered: 01/05/2021 02:32 PM]
January 5, 2021 CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [4991188] [21-1020] (AEV) [Entered: 01/05/2021 02:44 PM]
January 5, 2021 Prisoner case docketed. [4991169] [21-1020] (AEV) [Entered: 01/05/2021 02:22 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Daniel Hicks v. James McKinney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: James McKinney
Represented By: Benjamin Milton Parrott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: Daniel Louis Hicks
Represented By: Daniel Louis Hicks
Represented By: Andrew J. Dunn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?