Billy Nichols, Jr. v. D.W. Jackson, et al
| Billy Mack Nichols, Jr. |
| Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections, Lay, Warden, Brickey's, East Arkansas Regional Max Unit, D. W. Jackson, Deputy Warden, Brickey's, East Arkansas Regional Max Unit and Greg Rechcigl, Health Services Administrator, Arkansas Department of Corrections |
| 21-1063 |
| January 8, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| INMATE ACCOUNT STATEMENT with document titled, "Amended Petition for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis", filed by Mr. Billy Mack Nichols, Jr. on 02/05/2021[5011565] [21-1063] (AEV) [Entered: 03/05/2021 02:03 PM] |
| RESPONSE to clerk order to pay full filing fee titled, "Petition for leave to proceed in forma pauperis", [ # 4992602-2 ], [ # 4992602-3 ] filed by Party Mr. Billy Mack Nichols, Jr. w/service 02/03/2021. [5002531] [21-1063] (AEV) [Entered: 02/08/2021 05:51 PM] |
| UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 21-1063: pending] [5002533] [21-1063] (AEV) [Entered: 02/08/2021 05:53 PM] |
| MOTION for hearing and for preliminary injunctive relief, filed by Appellant Mr. Billy Mack Nichols, Jr. w/service 02/03/2021. [5002534] [21-1063] (AEV) [Entered: 02/08/2021 05:55 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 5000019-2 ] motion for extension of time to file a response to the order regarding the filing fee for an additional 14 days, or until February 22, 2021, filed by Appellant Mr. Billy Mack Nichols, Jr.. [5000026] [21-1063] (AEV) [Entered: 02/01/2021 03:08 PM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file a response to the order regarding the filing fee, filed by Appellant Mr. Billy Mack Nichols, Jr. w/service 01/26/2021. [5000019] [21-1063] (AEV) [Entered: 02/01/2021 02:59 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Recommended Disposition 9/17/20, Order 10/7/20, order 10/7/20, Order 11/10/20, Order 1/8/21, docket entries, [4992596] [21-1063] (AEV) [Entered: 01/08/2021 03:03 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [4992599] [21-1063] (AEV) [Entered: 01/08/2021 03:04 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The district Court has determined that Appellant has three strikes under 28 U.S.C Section 1915(g). Accordingly, Appellant may not proceed in this appeal without first paying the full appellate docketing fee. Appellant is directed to pay to the district court the appellate docketing fee of $505, or to file a pleading in this court explaining why Appellant is eligible to proceed without pre-payment of the fee. If appellant fails to either pay the fee or respond to this order within 30 days of the date of this order, the appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Compliance is due 02/08/2021 [4992602] [21-1063] (AEV) [Entered: 01/08/2021 03:06 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [4992593] [21-1063] (AEV) [Entered: 01/08/2021 02:59 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Billy Nichols, Jr. v. D.W. Jackson, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Billy Mack Nichols, Jr. | |
| Represented By: | Billy Mack Nichols Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Lay, Warden, Brickey's, East Arkansas Regional Max Unit | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: D. W. Jackson, Deputy Warden, Brickey's, East Arkansas Regional Max Unit | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Greg Rechcigl, Health Services Administrator, Arkansas Department of Corrections | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
