Marcus Mitchell v. Kyle Kirchmeier, et al
Morton County Sheriff's Deputy George Piehl, North Dakota Highway Patrol Sergeant Benjamin Kennelly, City of Bismarck, Bismarck Police Officer Tyler Welk, Morton County Sheriff Kyle Kirchmeier, Morton County and John Does 1-2 |
Marcus Mitchell |
21-1071 |
January 11, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CLERK ORDER:Granting in Part [ # 5012047-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Ms. Easha Anand [5012146] Brief of Marcus Mitchell due 04/23/2021. Appendix due on 04/23/2021 [5012146] [21-1071] (CRJ) [Entered: 03/08/2021 03:10 PM] |
MOTION for extension of time to file brief until 05/10/2021, filed by Attorney Ms. Easha Anand for Appellant Mr. Marcus Mitchell w/service 03/08/2021. [5012047] [21-1071] (EA) [Entered: 03/08/2021 12:44 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Easha Anand for Appellant Mr. Marcus Mitchell w/service 03/05/2021 [5011588] [21-1071] (EA) [Entered: 03/05/2021 02:22 PM] |
CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 5002954-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Mr. Amir H. Ali. Brief of Marcus Mitchell due 03/24/2021. Appendix due on 03/24/2021. [5003162] [21-1071] (ALK) [Entered: 02/10/2021 10:30 AM] |
MOTION for extension of time to file brief until 03/24/2021, filed by Attorney Mr. Amir H. Ali for Appellant Mr. Marcus Mitchell w/service 02/09/2021. [5002954] [21-1071] (AHA) [Entered: 02/09/2021 03:57 PM] |
METHOD of appendix preparation filed by Appellant Mr. Marcus Mitchell - Separate Appendix - w/service 01/25/2021 [4997461] [21-1071] (AHA) [Entered: 01/25/2021 11:49 AM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Vanessa del Valle for Appellant Mr. Marcus Mitchell w/service 01/25/2021 [4997479] [21-1071] (VD) [Entered: 01/25/2021 12:04 PM] |
STATEMENT of issues filed by Appellant Mr. Marcus Mitchell - w/service 01/25/2021. [4997463] [21-1071] (AHA) [Entered: 01/25/2021 11:50 AM] |
DESIGNATION of record filed by Appellant Mr. Marcus Mitchell. w/service 01/25/2021 [4997458] [21-1071] (AHA) [Entered: 01/25/2021 11:47 AM] |
Certificate of transcript filed by Appellant Mr. Marcus Mitchell. No Transcript[4997455] [21-1071] (AHA) [Entered: 01/25/2021 11:46 AM] |
APPEARANCE filed by James E. Nicolai for Appellee Mr. Benjamin Kennelly w/service 01/20/2021 [4996268] [21-1071] (JEN) [Entered: 01/20/2021 04:48 PM] |
CORPORATE disclosure statement filed by Appellant Mr. Marcus Mitchell. - FOR CAL [4994194] [21-1071] (AHA) [Entered: 01/13/2021 03:55 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Shawn Grinolds for Appellees City of Bismarck, Mr. Kyle Kirchmeier, Morton County, Mr. George Piehl and Mr. Tyler Welk w/service 01/13/2021 [4994184] [21-1071] (SAG) [Entered: 01/13/2021 03:49 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Randall Bakke for Appellees City of Bismarck, Mr. Kyle Kirchmeier, Morton County, Mr. George Piehl and Mr. Tyler Welk w/service 01/13/2021 [4994179] [21-1071] (RJB) [Entered: 01/13/2021 03:47 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Amir H. Ali for Appellant Mr. Marcus Mitchell w/service 01/13/2021 [4993818] [21-1071] (AHA) [Entered: 01/13/2021 08:58 AM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, order of 12/10/2020, judgment of 12/10/2020 [4992825] [21-1071] (CYZ) [Entered: 01/11/2021 10:31 AM] |
BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Appendix due on 02/22/2021. BRIEF OF APPELLANT Marcus Mitchell due 02/22/2021. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [4992832] [21-1071] (CYZ) [Entered: 01/11/2021 10:33 AM] |
Civil case docketed. [4992817] [21-1071] (CYZ) [Entered: 01/11/2021 10:27 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.