Deborah Swarthout v. Andrew Saul
| Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security |
| Deborah Swarthout |
| 21-1076 |
| January 11, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Deborah Swarthout v. Kilolo Kijakazi
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Originating court document filed consisting of consent to magistrate judge assignment. [5011547] [21-1076] (CBO) [Entered: 03/05/2021 01:51 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE filed by Attorney Mr. Dana W. Duncan for Appellant Ms. Deborah Swarthout correcting [ # 5008097-2 ] motion filed by Attorney. [5008549] [21-1076] (DWD) [Entered: 02/25/2021 02:40 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 5008097-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Mr. Dana W. Duncan. Brief of Deborah Swarthout due 04/01/2021. Appendix due on 04/01/2021. [5008684] [21-1076] (CRJ) [Entered: 02/25/2021 04:30 PM] |
| On December 1, 2016, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure were amended to require a certificate of compliance for motions filed under [Rule 27], certifying that the document complies with the type-volume limitations and stating the number of words in the document. Your recently filed motion did not contain this certificate of compliance. No action will be taken on your motion for extension of time to file brief, [ # 5008097-2 ], submitted by Mr. Dana W. Duncan in 21-1076 , pending the filing of a certificate of compliance using the 'Certificate of Compliance' event. Please do not refile your motion [21-1076] (CRJ) [Entered: 02/24/2021 04:19 PM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file brief until 04/01/2021, filed by Attorney Mr. Dana W. Duncan for Appellant Ms. Deborah Swarthout w/service 02/24/2021. [5008097] [21-1076] (DWD) [Entered: 02/24/2021 03:06 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by James D. Sides for Appellee Mr. Andrew Saul w/service 01/29/2021 [4999461] [21-1076] (JDS) [Entered: 01/29/2021 01:17 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of docket entries, order filed 11/10/2020, judgment filed 11/10/2020, and notice of appeal filed 1/8/2021. [4992927] [21-1076] (CBO) [Entered: 01/11/2021 12:08 PM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Administrative Record due 02/22/2021. Appendix due 03/02/2021. BRIEF APPELLANT, Deborah Swarthout due 03/02/2021 Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [4992939] [21-1076] (CBO) [Entered: 01/11/2021 12:19 PM] |
| Civil case docketed. [4992923] [21-1076] (CBO) [Entered: 01/11/2021 12:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Deborah Swarthout v. Andrew Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | James D. Sides |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Deborah Swarthout | |
| Represented By: | Dana W. Duncan |
| Represented By: | Jennifer G. Mrozik |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
