Manetirony Clervrain v. Mark Dayton, et al
John Sandweg, Director (ICE), Mark Dayton, Governor, Lori Swanson, Attorney General of Minnesota and Steve Simon, Secretary of State |
Manetirony Clervrain |
21-1189 |
January 26, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
JUDGMENT FILED - Case dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant's pending motions are denied as moot. [ # 5001278-2 ] [ # 5001279-2 ] [ # 5006459-2 ] [ # 5006461-2 ] [ # 5009218-2 ] [ # 5009219-2 ] DUANE BENTON, JANE KELLY and JONATHAN A. KOBES Adp Mar 2021 [5013342] [21-1189] (HAG) [Entered: 03/11/2021 11:02 AM] |
RESPONSE in opposition to clerk order for failure to pay docket fee [ # 5007074-2 ], clerk order [ # 5007074-3 ], clerk order pay docketing fee [ # 4998116-2 ], clerk order [ # 4998116-3 ], motion for remand [ # 5001279-2 ] filed by Party Mr. Manetirony Clervrain , w/service 02/28/2021. [5009217] [21-1189] (MC) [Entered: 02/28/2021 10:45 AM] |
MOTION to add a party to this case., for reconsideration of clerk order for failure to pay docket fee, [ # 5007074-2 ], clerk order, [ # 5007074-3 ], clerk order pay docketing fee, [ # 4998116-2 ], clerk order, [ # 4998116-3 ], clerk order taken with case for submission, [ # 5002111-2 ], clerk order, [ # 5002111-4 ], for initial Hearing En Banc, for reconsideration of, to participate in oral argument., filed by Party Mr. Manetirony Clervrain w/service 02/28/2021. [5009218] [21-1189] (MC) [Entered: 02/28/2021 10:52 AM] |
MOTION to file supplemental brief, for oral argument, for initial Hearing En Banc, to reschedule oral argument from until, for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed by Party Mr. Manetirony Clervrain w/service 02/28/2021. [5009219] [21-1189] (MC) [Entered: 02/28/2021 10:56 AM] |
CLERK ORDER:APPELLANT has failed to pay to the Clerk of the District Court the requisite docketing fees. APPELLANT is directed to show cause within 14 days why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. dockt fee due on 03/15/2021 [5007074] [21-1189] (CBO) [Entered: 02/23/2021 09:11 AM] |
MOTION for Mitigating Financial Burden, etc., filed by Appellant Mr. Manetirony Clervrain w/service 02/21/2021. [5006459] [21-1189]--[Edited 03/10/2021 by EDG to correct event code] (MC) [Entered: 02/21/2021 01:15 PM] |
MOTION Mitigating Financial Burden, etc., filed by Appellant Mr. Manetirony Clervrain w/service 02/21/2021. [5006461] [21-1189]--[Edited 03/10/2021 by EDG to correct event code] (MC) [Entered: 02/21/2021 01:31 PM] |
LOCKED - APPELLANT brief of Mr. Manetirony Clervrain submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [5005552] [21-1189]--[Edited 03/15/2021 by EDG to show as refiled on 2/28/21 motion to file sup brief #5009219) ] (MC) [Entered: 02/18/2021 09:13 AM] |
CLERK ORDER:motion for remand filed by Appellant Mr. Manetirony Clervrain in 21-1189 , [ # 5001279-2 ], and motion to file supplemental brief filed by Appellant Mr. Manetirony Clervrain in 21-1189 , [ # 5001278-2 ] are hereby ordered taken with the case for consideration by the panel to which this case is submitted for disposition on the merits. - FOR CAL [5002111] [21-1189] (CBO) [Entered: 02/08/2021 08:20 AM] |
MOTION for partial remand, filed by Party Mr. Manetirony Clervrain w/service 02/04/2021. [5001279] [21-1189] (MC) [Entered: 02/04/2021 06:13 AM] |
MOTION to file supplemental brief, filed by Party Mr. Manetirony Clervrain w/service 02/03/2021. [5001278] [21-1189] (MC) [Entered: 02/04/2021 06:06 AM] |
LETTER filed by Appellant Mr. Manetirony Clervrain - w/service 01/31/2021. [4999648] [21-1189]--[Edited 02/01/2021 by EDG to correct event code] LETTER from Appellant Mr. Manetirony Clervrain regarding change of address. w/service 02/01/2021 [4999648] [21-1189]--[Edited 02/01/2021 by CBO] (MC) [Entered: 01/31/2021 09:50 AM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of docket entries, report and recommendation filed 5/8/2019, order adopting r&r filed 8/9/2019, judgment filed 8/12/2019, order filed 1/22/2021, and notice of appeal filed 1/26/2021. [4998111] [21-1189] (CBO) [Entered: 01/26/2021 02:42 PM] |
CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 02/23/2021, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [4998116] [21-1189] (CBO) [Entered: 01/26/2021 02:45 PM] |
CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [4998122] [21-1189] (CBO) [Entered: 01/26/2021 02:48 PM] |
Prisoner case docketed. [4998103] [21-1189] (CBO) [Entered: 01/26/2021 02:31 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.