Byron Whetsel v. Chad Pringle
Chad Pringle |
Byron Whetsel |
21-1379 |
February 18, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CLERK LETTER sent to appellant regarding status of appeal. [5024378] [21-1379] (CYZ) [Entered: 04/12/2021 12:21 PM] |
LETTER from Appellant Mr. Byron Whetsel regarding status of appeal. [5024374] [21-1379] (CYZ) [Entered: 04/12/2021 12:15 PM] |
CLERK ORDER: The motion for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Mr. Byron Whetsel in 21-1379 , [ # 5009247-2 ] is hereby ordered taken with the case for consideration by the panel to which this case is submitted for disposition on the merits. - FOR CAL [5009252] [21-1379] (CYZ) [Entered: 03/01/2021 08:56 AM] |
MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed by Appellant Mr. Byron Whetsel. [5009258] [21-1379] (CYZ) [Entered: 03/01/2021 09:00 AM] |
MOTION for appointment of counsel, filed by Appellant Mr. Byron Whetsel w/service 03/01/2021. [5009247] [21-1379] (CYZ) [Entered: 03/01/2021 08:49 AM] |
MEMORANDUM of Appellant Mr. Byron Whetsel in support of originating court document notice of appeal, , Doc No. [ # 5005893-2 ]. w/service 02/18/2021. [5005907] [21-1379] (CYZ) [Entered: 02/18/2021 03:44 PM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, order of 1/27/21, judgment of 1/27/21 [5005893] [21-1379] (CYZ) [Entered: 02/18/2021 03:35 PM] |
CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5005895] [21-1379] (CYZ) [Entered: 02/18/2021 03:36 PM] |
CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 03/18/2021, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5005898] [21-1379] (CYZ) [Entered: 02/18/2021 03:38 PM] |
Prisoner case docketed. [5005884] [21-1379] (CYZ) [Entered: 02/18/2021 03:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Byron Whetsel v. Chad Pringle | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: Chad Pringle | |
Represented By: | Michael T. Mahoney |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: Byron Whetsel | |
Represented By: | Byron Whetsel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.