United States v. Rosendo Garcia-Navarro
Rosendo Garcia-Navarro |
United States of America |
21-1420 |
February 24, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MANDATE ISSUED. [5026490] [21-1420] (CMD) [Entered: 04/16/2021 01:17 PM] |
JUDGE ORDER:Granting [ # 5008674-2 ] motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Ms. Rachael Steenholdt.; Granting [ # 5008674-3 ] motion for extension of time to file rehearing filed by Ms. Rachael Steenholdt. Petition for rehearing due on 04/07/2021 Adp Feb 2021 [5009246] [21-1420] (CMD) [Entered: 03/01/2021 08:49 AM] |
MOTION to withdraw as appointed counsel, for extension of time to file petition for rehearing until 04/07/2021, filed by Attorney Ms. Rachael Steenholdt for Appellant Mr. Rosendo Garcia-Navarro w/service 02/25/2021. [5008674] [21-1420] (RS) [Entered: 02/25/2021 04:17 PM] |
JUDGMENT FILED - This denial of appellant's compassionate release is summarily affirmed. JAMES B. LOKEN, ROGER L. WOLLMAN and DUANE BENTON Adp Feb 2021 [5008162] [21-1420] (HAG) [Entered: 02/24/2021 04:16 PM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, criminal judgment of 7/19/2012, order granting reduction of 10/7/2015, order regarding reduction of 10/92015, motion for reduction, supplement to motion, response to motion, reply, order denyng motion of 2/8/2021 [5007786] [21-1420] (CYZ) [Entered: 02/24/2021 09:57 AM] |
CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges James B. Loken, Roger L. Wollman, Duane Benton in St. Louis [5008158] [21-1420] (HAG) [Entered: 02/24/2021 04:14 PM] |
CRIMINAL case docketed. [5007770] [21-1420] (CYZ) [Entered: 02/24/2021 09:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.