Joseph Engel v. Jefferson County, et al
| Jeff Co Sheriff, Official Capacity, Jeff Co Administration Staff, Official Capacity, Jeff Co Deputy Sheriff, Official Capacity, Att General, Official Capacity, Assist Att General, Official Capacity, Jefferson County, Official Capacity, Jeff Co Medical Staff, Official Capacity, Jeff Co Sheriff, Captain, Official Capacity, Jeff Co Sheriff Dept, Sg, Official Capacity, Governor, Official Capacity, Jeff Co Sheriff Dept, Corpel, Official Capacity, House Rep MO, Official Capacity, Jefferson County Sheriff's Department, Lt, Official Capacity, Jefferson County Sheriff's Department, Official Capacity, Lt Governor, Official Capacity, Unknown Senator MO, Official Capacity, Missouri House of Representatives, Official Capacity, Jefferson County Deputy Sheriff, Official Capacity, Assistant Attorney General, Official Capacity, Captain Jefferson County Sheriff's Department, Official Capacity, Jefferson County Medical Staff, Official Capacity, Lieutenant Jefferson County Sheriff's Department, Official Capacity, Jefferson County Administration Staff, Official Capacity, Jefferson County Sheriff, Official Capacity, Attorney General, Official Capacity, Unknown Senator of Missouri, Official Capacity, Lieutenant Governor, Official Capacity, Corporal Jefferson County Sheriff's Department, Official Capacity and Sergeant Jefferson County Sheriff's Department, Official Capacity |
| Joseph Michael Devon Engel |
| 21-1427 |
| February 24, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER:APPELLANT has failed to pay to the Clerk of the District Court the requisite docketing fees. APPELLANT is directed to show cause within 14 days why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Response of Joseph Michael Devon Engel due 04/29/2021 [5025965] [21-1427] (CAH) [Entered: 04/15/2021 12:39 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5007907] [21-1427] (CAH) [Entered: 02/24/2021 12:14 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The District Court has determined that Appellant has three strikes under 28 U.S.C Section 1915(g). Accordingly, Appellant may not proceed in this appeal without first paying the full appellate docketing fee. Appellant is directed to pay to the district court the appellate docketing fee of $505, or to file a pleading in this court explaining why Appellant is eligible to proceed without pre-payment of the fee. If appellant fails to either pay the fee or respond to this order within 30 days of the date of this order, the appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Compliance is due 03/26/2021 [5007903] [21-1427] (CAH) [Entered: 02/24/2021 12:11 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, opinion 1/21/21, dismissal order 1/21/21, opinion 2/9/21. [5007899] [21-1427] (CAH) [Entered: 02/24/2021 12:07 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5007896] [21-1427] (CAH) [Entered: 02/24/2021 12:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
