James Shaughnessy v. Edward Southern, MD
| James W. Shaughnessy |
| Edward P. Southern, MD |
| 21-1463 |
| March 1, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| James Shaughnessy v. Edward Southern, MD |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Addendum of APPELLANT submitted for review by Mr. James W. Shaughnessy. To open/view this addendum, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. [5024248] [21-1463] (JWS) [Entered: 04/12/2021 10:01 AM] |
| CORRECTED/INITIAL certificate of compliance for Submitted brief, Doc No. [ # 5024240-2 ], filed by Appellant Mr. James W. Shaughnessy [5024301] [21-1463]--[Edited 04/12/2021 by ALK to correct document title in docket text] (JWS) [Entered: 04/12/2021 10:55 AM] |
| BRIEF FILED - APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. James W. Shaughnessy. w/service 04/12/2021 by USCA8, Length: 23 pages (5 copies) Brief of Edward P. Southern due on 05/12/2021 [5024356] [21-1463] (ALK) [Entered: 04/12/2021 11:50 AM] |
| ADDENDUM of APPELLANT FILED by Appellant Mr. James W. Shaughnessy , w/service 04/12/2021 by USCA8 (5 copies) [5024361] [21-1463] (ALK) [Entered: 04/12/2021 11:57 AM] |
| APPELLANT brief of Mr. James W. Shaughnessy submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [5024240] [21-1463] (JWS) [Entered: 04/12/2021 09:57 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by John P. Pavelko for Appellee Edward P. Southern w/service 03/16/2021 [5015094] [21-1463] (JP) [Entered: 03/16/2021 11:33 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Gregory E. Karpenko for Appellee Edward P. Southern w/service 03/16/2021 [5015089] [21-1463] (GEK) [Entered: 03/16/2021 11:31 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, and Judgment 1/27/21 [5009407] [21-1463] (MMH) [Entered: 03/01/2021 11:38 AM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Appendix due on 04/12/2021. BRIEF OF APPELLANT James W. Shaughnessy due 04/12/2021. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5009415] [21-1463] (MMH) [Entered: 03/01/2021 11:45 AM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5009394] [21-1463] (MMH) [Entered: 03/01/2021 11:27 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: James Shaughnessy v. Edward Southern, MD | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: James W. Shaughnessy | |
| Represented By: | James W. Shaughnessy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Edward P. Southern, MD | |
| Represented By: | Gregory E. Karpenko |
| Represented By: | John Pavelko |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
