James Clark v. Floyd Crues, et al
Alternative Discipline and Behavioral Concepts (ADBC) |
Amy Hilgerman, Bill Hass, School Service Systems, (SSS), Alternative Unlimited Inc., Unknown Pineau, Robert Lee, Veronica O'Brian, Larry Hutchins and Richard Bates |
Darnetta Clinkscale, Shane Hopper, Ken Brostrum, St. Louis Public School Board of Education, Former, St. Louis Public School District, SLPS, Vincent Schoemehl, Robert Jackson, Steven Warmack, Silvia Shead, Mel Gunther, Floyd Crues and Ron Archibald |
James Hedman Clark |
21-1610 |
March 16, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 21-1610: In Forma Pauperis] [5031055] [21-1610] (CMH) [Entered: 04/30/2021 05:14 PM] |
RESPONSE in opposition to clerk order for failure to pay docket fee [ # 5026705-2 ] filed by Party Mr. James Hedman Clark , w/service 04/23/2021. [5031056] [21-1610] (CMH) [Entered: 04/30/2021 05:17 PM] |
CLERK ORDER: Appellant has submitted a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis which was forwarded to the U.S. District Court for filing and an initial ruling. Therefore, the show cause order of 4/19/2021 is hereby dissolved. [5027525] [21-1610] (CMH) [Entered: 04/20/2021 03:57 PM] |
MOTION informational regarding appellant's disability condition(s), filed by Appellant Mr. James Hedman Clark w/service 04/20/2021. [5027532] [21-1610] (CMH) [Entered: 04/20/2021 04:10 PM] |
CLERK ORDER: APPELLANT has failed to pay to the Clerk of the District Court the requisite docketing fees. APPELLANT is directed to show cause within 14 days why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Response of James Hedman Clark due 05/03/2021. [5026705] [21-1610] (CMH) [Entered: 04/19/2021 08:56 AM] |
DOCUMENT FILED - copy of motion filed in district court to clarify or amend/correct the case caption filed by Mr. James Hedman Clark. (Document was received via fax.) [5025653] [21-1610] (CMH) [Entered: 04/14/2021 02:48 PM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of second notice of appeal, docket entries, and Memorandum & Order dated 1/15/2021. [5015994] [21-1610] (CMH) [Entered: 03/18/2021 10:57 AM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Memorandum & Order dated 1/15/2021. [5015347] [21-1610] (CMH) [Entered: 03/16/2021 03:58 PM] |
CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5015350] [21-1610] (CMH) [Entered: 03/16/2021 04:01 PM] |
CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within 21 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 04/06/2021, a show cause order will be entered directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. [5015373] [21-1610] (CMH) [Entered: 03/16/2021 04:13 PM] |
Civil case docketed. [5015299] [21-1610] (CMH) [Entered: 03/16/2021 03:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.