Alan Pierce v. Andrew Saul
Plaintiff / Appellant: Alan Pierce
Defendant / Appellee: Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 21-1623
Filed: March 17, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 5, 2022 Summary Pierce v. Kijakazi

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 12, 2021 BRIEF FILED - APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. Alan Pierce. w/service 05/10/2021 , Length: 5,685 words 10 COPIES OF PAPER BRIEFS (WITHOUT THE APPELLATE PDF FOOTER) FROM Alan Pierce due 05/17/2021 WITH certificate of service for paper briefs. Brief of Andrew Saul due on 06/11/2021 [5034582] [21-1623] (CMD) [Entered: 05/12/2021 09:19 AM]
May 12, 2021 ADDENDUM of APPELLANT FILED by Appellant Mr. Alan Pierce , w/service 05/10/2021 [5034585] [21-1623] (CMD) [Entered: 05/12/2021 09:21 AM]
May 10, 2021 Addendum of APPELLANT submitted for review by Mr. Alan Pierce. To open/view this addendum, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. [5033998] [21-1623] (EGW) [Entered: 05/10/2021 11:06 PM]
May 10, 2021 APPELLANT brief of Mr. Alan Pierce submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [5033997] [21-1623] (EGW) [Entered: 05/10/2021 11:05 PM]
March 18, 2021 APPEARANCE filed by E. Gregory Wallace for Appellant Mr. Alan Pierce w/service 03/18/2021 [5015914] [21-1623] (SBW) [Entered: 03/18/2021 09:31 AM]
March 18, 2021 METHOD of appendix preparation filed by Appellant Mr. Alan Pierce - Separate Appendix - w/service 03/18/2021 [5015912] [21-1623] (SBW) [Entered: 03/18/2021 09:29 AM]
March 17, 2021 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Opinion, Memorandum & Order and Judgment both dated 2/2/2021. [5015567] [21-1623] (CMH) [Entered: 03/17/2021 11:25 AM]
March 17, 2021 BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Administrative Record due 04/26/2021. Appendix due 05/10/2021. BRIEF APPELLANT, Alan Pierce due 05/10/2021 Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5015570] [21-1623] (CMH) [Entered: 03/17/2021 11:27 AM]
March 17, 2021 Civil case docketed. [5015559] [21-1623] (CMH) [Entered: 03/17/2021 11:22 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Alan Pierce v. Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Alan Pierce
Represented By: Eugene Gregory Wallace
Represented By: Stephanie Bartels Wallace
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Nicholas P. Llewellyn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?