Mark Fellows, et al v. MN Association of Professional
Plaintiff / Appellee: Mark Fellows, Alicia Bonner and Catherine Wyatt, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant: Minnesota Association of Professional Employees
Case Number: 21-1723
Filed: March 31, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 3, 2021 STIPULATION for dismissal filed by Appellant Minnesota Association of Professional Employees in 21-1723, Appellee Minnesota Association of Professional Employees in 21-1684. w/service 05/03/2021 [5031269] [21-1723, 21-1684] (PCP) [Entered: 05/03/2021 12:05 PM]
May 3, 2021 JUDGMENT FILED - Granting [ # 5031269-2 ] Stipulation Dismissal filed by Appellant Minnesota Association of Professional Employees. The case is dismissed in accordance with Rule 42(b), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Mandate shall issue forthwith. [5031441] [21-1723] (CMD) [Entered: 05/03/2021 03:17 PM]
May 3, 2021 MANDATE ISSUED. [5031451] [21-1723] (CMD) [Entered: 05/03/2021 03:21 PM]
April 21, 2021 REVISED BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Brief of Alicia Bonner, Mark Fellows and Catherine Wyatt due 05/21/2021. Appendix due on 05/21/2021 [21-1684, 21-1723] (ALK) [Entered: 04/21/2021 03:39 PM]
April 16, 2021 RESPONSE in opposition to motion to dismiss case [ # 5023437-2 ] filed by Attorney Mr. Jeffrey Michael Schwab for Appellants Ms. Alicia Bonner, Mr. Mark Fellows and Ms. Catherine Wyatt in 21-1684 , w/service 04/16/2021. [5026619] [21-1684, 21-1723] (JMS) [Entered: 04/16/2021 04:22 PM]
April 8, 2021 CLERK LETTER sent to hold briefing schedule in abeyance pending ruling on motion to dismiss. [5023598] [21-1684, 21-1723] (ALK) [Entered: 04/08/2021 04:16 PM]
April 5, 2021 Certificate of transcript filed by Appellants Ms. Alicia Bonner, Mr. Mark Fellows and Ms. Catherine Wyatt in 21-1684, Appellees Ms. Alicia Bonner, Mr. Mark Fellows and Ms. Catherine Wyatt in 21-1723. No Transcript Not Ordered [5022124] [21-1684, 21-1723] (JMS) [Entered: 04/05/2021 03:50 PM]
April 5, 2021 METHOD of appendix preparation filed by Appellants Ms. Alicia Bonner, Mr. Mark Fellows and Ms. Catherine Wyatt in 21-1684, Appellees Ms. Alicia Bonner, Mr. Mark Fellows and Ms. Catherine Wyatt in 21-1723 - Separate Appendix - w/service 04/05/2021 [5022120] [21-1684, 21-1723] (JMS) [Entered: 04/05/2021 03:48 PM]
April 5, 2021 STATEMENT of issues filed by Appellants Ms. Alicia Bonner, Mr. Mark Fellows and Ms. Catherine Wyatt in 21-1684, Appellees Ms. Alicia Bonner and Mr. Mark Fellows in 21-1723 - w/service 04/05/2021. [5022117] [21-1684, 21-1723] (JMS) [Entered: 04/05/2021 03:46 PM]
April 1, 2021 CROSS APPEAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on or before 05/11/2021. BRIEF APPELLANT, Alicia Bonner, Mark Fellows and Catherine Wyatt due 05/21/2021. Appendix due 05/21/2021. Appellee/cross Appellant brief due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellant's brief. [5020880] [21-1684, 21-1723] (MMH) [Entered: 04/01/2021 10:19 AM]
March 31, 2021 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order granting extension of time to file NOA 3/22/21, and Order denying reconsideration of extension 3/25/21 [5020662] [21-1723] (MMH) [Entered: 03/31/2021 02:35 PM]
March 31, 2021 Civil case docketed. [5020624] [21-1723] (MMH) [Entered: 03/31/2021 02:04 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Mark Fellows, et al v. MN Association of Professional
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: Mark Fellows
Represented By: Douglas Seaton
Represented By: Craig S. Krummen
Represented By: Jeffrey Michael Schwab
Represented By: Daniel Robert Suhr
Represented By: William L. Messenger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: Alicia Bonner
Represented By: Douglas Seaton
Represented By: Craig S. Krummen
Represented By: Jeffrey Michael Schwab
Represented By: Daniel Robert Suhr
Represented By: William L. Messenger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: Catherine Wyatt, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated
Represented By: Douglas Seaton
Represented By: Craig S. Krummen
Represented By: Jeffrey Michael Schwab
Represented By: Daniel Robert Suhr
Represented By: William L. Messenger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: Minnesota Association of Professional Employees
Represented By: Amanda C. Lynch
Represented By: Scott A. Kronland
Represented By: Brendan D. Cummins
Represented By: Justin D. Cummins
Represented By: Patrick Casey Pitts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?