John Hall, Sr. v. State of Missouri
| State of Missouri |
| John Allen Hall, Sr. |
| 21-1727 |
| March 31, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JUDGMENT FILED - Granting [ # 5038673-2 ] motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Mr. John Allen Hall, Sr. Case dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as untimely. RALPH R. ERICKSON, DAVID R. STRAS and JONATHAN A. KOBES Adp May 2021 [5039809] [21-1727] (MVP) [Entered: 05/27/2021 10:36 AM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Appellant Mr. John Allen Hall, Sr. w/service 05/24/2021. [5038673] [21-1727] (CAH) [Entered: 05/24/2021 03:05 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:APPELLANT has failed to pay to the Clerk of the District Court the requisite docketing fees, nor has he applied for in forma pauperis in this court. APPELLANT is directed to show cause within 14 days why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Response of John Allen Hall Sr. due 05/20/2021 [5032692] [21-1727] (CAH) [Entered: 05/06/2021 09:19 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5020668] [21-1727] (CAH) [Entered: 03/31/2021 02:40 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, dismissal order 2/11/21, judgment 2/11/21, order 3/31/21. [5020663] [21-1727] (CAH) [Entered: 03/31/2021 02:35 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 04/28/2021, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5020665] [21-1727] (CAH) [Entered: 03/31/2021 02:38 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5020657] [21-1727] (CAH) [Entered: 03/31/2021 02:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: John Hall, Sr. v. State of Missouri | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: State of Missouri | |
| Represented By: | Patrick Joseph Logan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: John Allen Hall, Sr. | |
| Represented By: | John Allen Hall Sr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
