Michael Goodwin v. United States
Respondent / Appellee: United States of America
Petitioner / Appellant: Michael Goodwin
Case Number: 21-1759
Filed: April 6, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 3, 2021 UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 21-1759: In Forma Pauperis] [5041569] [21-1759] (CJO) [Entered: 06/03/2021 08:22 AM]
May 18, 2021 Originating court document filed consisting of originating court order of 05/11/2021, Granting Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis.[5036795] [21-1759] (CJO) [Entered: 05/18/2021 12:59 PM]
May 4, 2021 CLERK ORDER: In response to the order to show cause, appellant seeks an extension of time to move in the district court for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The request is granted and appellant is granted 14 days to move for in forma pauperis status in the district court. The show cause order of 04/29/2021 is hereby dissolved. [5031938] [21-1759] (CJO) [Entered: 05/04/2021 02:27 PM]
May 4, 2021 RESPONSE to show cause order for failure to pay docket fee [ # 5030554-2 ] filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Goodwin, w/service 05/04/2021. [5031854] [21-1759] (CJO) [Entered: 05/04/2021 12:26 PM]
April 29, 2021 CLERK ORDER:APPELLANT has failed to pay to the Clerk of the District Court the requisite docketing fees. APPELLANT is directed to show cause within 14 days why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Response of Michael Goodwin due 05/13/2021. [5030554] [21-1759] (CJO) [Entered: 04/29/2021 03:25 PM]
April 6, 2021 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Opinion, Memorandum and Order 02/16/2021, Judgment 02/16/2021, and Opinion, Memorandum and Order 03/24/2021. [5022412] [21-1759] (CJO) [Entered: 04/06/2021 10:59 AM]
April 6, 2021 CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5022413] [21-1759] (CJO) [Entered: 04/06/2021 11:02 AM]
April 6, 2021 Prisoner case docketed. [5022347] [21-1759] (CJO) [Entered: 04/06/2021 10:15 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Michael Goodwin v. United States
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: United States of America
Represented By: Jillian Susanna Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: Michael Goodwin
Represented By: David Earl Woods
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?