William Adams v. City of Lincoln, et al
Defendant: Jeffrey Sorensen
Defendant / Appellee: Joseph Villamonte, Daniel Dufek and City of Lincoln
Plaintiff / Appellant: William Adams
Case Number: 21-1862
Filed: April 19, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 17, 2021 William Adams v. City of Lincoln

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 2, 2021 CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 5041077-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Mr. Matt Catlett. Brief of William Adams due 07/01/2021. Appendix due on 07/01/2021. [5041108] [21-1862] (ALK) [Entered: 06/02/2021 08:11 AM]
June 1, 2021 MOTION for extension of time to file brief until 07/01/2021, filed by Attorney Mr. Matt Catlett for Appellant Mr. William Adams w/service 06/01/2021. [5041077] [21-1862] (MC) [Entered: 06/01/2021 11:40 PM]
April 27, 2021 APPEARANCE filed by Jocelyn W. Golden for Appellees City of Lincoln, Mr. Daniel Dufek and Mr. Joseph Villamonte w/service 04/27/2021 [5029776] [21-1862] (JWG) [Entered: 04/27/2021 04:14 PM]
April 19, 2021 BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Appendix due on 06/01/2021. BRIEF OF APPELLANT William Adams due 06/01/2021. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5027002] [21-1862] (CMH) [Entered: 04/19/2021 03:36 PM]
April 19, 2021 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Memorandum & order and Judgment both filed 3/18/2021, and Order filed 4/19/2021. [5027000] [21-1862] (CMH) [Entered: 04/19/2021 03:35 PM]
April 19, 2021 Civil case docketed. [5026982] [21-1862] (CMH) [Entered: 04/19/2021 03:16 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: William Adams v. City of Lincoln, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Joseph Villamonte
Represented By: Jocelyn Walsh Golden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Daniel Dufek
Represented By: Jocelyn Walsh Golden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: City of Lincoln
Represented By: Jocelyn Walsh Golden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: William Adams
Represented By: Matt Catlett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeffrey Sorensen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?