Tim Washington v. Bill Stange
| Bill Stange |
| Tim Washington |
| 21-1869 |
| April 20, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION for Certificate of Appealability, filed by Appellant Mr. Tim Washington w/service 05/17/2021. [5036318] [21-1869] (CAH) [Entered: 05/17/2021 03:28 PM] |
| DOCUMENT FILED - copies of district court documents sent to usca8 by appellant Mr. Tim Washington. w/service 05/20/2021 [5037904] [21-1869] (CAH) [Entered: 05/20/2021 03:54 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of district court order of 04/30/2021 granting ifp, [5030933] [21-1869] (CAH) [Entered: 04/30/2021 02:10 PM] |
| UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 21-1869: In Forma Pauperis] [5030935] [21-1869] (CAH) [Entered: 04/30/2021 02:10 PM] |
| CLERK LETTER sent forwarding appellant's motion for leave to proceed ifp to the district court for a ruling. [5030491] [21-1869] (CAH) [Entered: 04/29/2021 02:24 PM] |
| Tendered Motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis received from Appellant Mr. Tim Washington w/service 04/29/2021 [5030489] [21-1869] (CAH) [Entered: 04/29/2021 02:22 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, memorandum & order 2/23/21, judgment 2/23/21. [5027191] [21-1869] (CAH) [Entered: 04/20/2021 09:38 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within 21 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 05/11/2021, a show cause order will be entered directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. [5027192] [21-1869] (CAH) [Entered: 04/20/2021 09:40 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5027195] [21-1869] (CAH) [Entered: 04/20/2021 09:44 AM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5027182] [21-1869] (CAH) [Entered: 04/20/2021 09:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Tim Washington v. Bill Stange | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: Bill Stange | |
| Represented By: | Andrew James Clarke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Tim Washington | |
| Represented By: | Tim Washington |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
