Harold Allen, Jr. v. United States
| Harold Blakely Allen, Jr. |
| United States of America |
| 21-2174 |
| May 25, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION for Permission to file a Successive Habeas Petition Response of United States of America due 06/08/2021 (Rec'd by MAIL), filed by Petitioner Mr. Harold Blakely Allen, Jr. w/service 05/25/2021. [5039170] [21-2174] (AEV) [Entered: 05/25/2021 03:18 PM] |
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [5039168] [21-2174] (AEV) [Entered: 05/25/2021 03:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Harold Allen, Jr. v. United States | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Anne E. Gardner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Harold Blakely Allen, Jr. | |
| Represented By: | Harold Blakely Allen Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
