Dean Davidson v. Mark Stringer, et al
Defendant / Appellee: Denise Hacker, F.S.H., et al and Mark Stringer, Director of MO Dept of Mental Health, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: Dean Bryan Davidson
Case Number: 21-2298
Filed: June 11, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2021 MANDATE ISSUED. [5062927] [21-2298] (BNW) [Entered: 08/06/2021 09:35 AM]
July 15, 2021 JUDGMENT FILED - The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis filed by Mr. Dean Bryan Davidson is denied as moot [ # 5054690-2 ]. JAMES B. LOKEN, RAYMOND W. GRUENDER and DUANE BENTON Adp July 2021 [5055405] [21-2298] (BNW) [Entered: 07/15/2021 04:47 PM]
July 14, 2021 MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit filed by Party Mr. Dean Bryan Davidson, w/service 07/14/2021, originally filed in the district court on 06/25/2021. [5054690] [21-2298] (CJO) [Entered: 07/14/2021 12:13 PM]
June 11, 2021 Support Documents filed by Appellant Mr. Dean Bryan Davidson in support of originating court document notice of appeal, , Doc No. [ # 5044543-2 ]., w/service 06/11/2021. [5044561] [21-2298] (CJO) [Entered: 06/11/2021 04:00 PM]
June 11, 2021 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Memorandum and Order 01/11/2021, Order of Dismissal 01/11/2021, Memorandum and Order 01/27/2021, and Memorandum and Order 06/03/2021. [5044543] [21-2298] (CJO) [Entered: 06/11/2021 03:46 PM]
June 11, 2021 CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 07/09/2021, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5044548] [21-2298] (CJO) [Entered: 06/11/2021 03:51 PM]
June 11, 2021 Prisoner case docketed. [5044538] [21-2298] (CJO) [Entered: 06/11/2021 03:40 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Dean Davidson v. Mark Stringer, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Denise Hacker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: F.S.H., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Mark Stringer, Director of MO Dept of Mental Health, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Dean Bryan Davidson
Represented By: Dean Bryan Davidson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?