Justin Sulzner v. State of Iowa, et al
| Judge Margaret Lingreen, Judge Richard D. Stochl, State of Iowa, David Hanson and Judge John Bauercamper |
| Justin Paul Sulzner |
| 21-2397 |
| June 24, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| PETITION for rehearing by panel filed by Appellant Mr. Justin Paul Sulzner w/service 08/11/2021. [5064580] [21-2397] (BNW) [Entered: 08/11/2021 01:00 PM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - The decision of the district court is summarily affirmed. STEVEN M. COLLOTON, JANE KELLY and L. STEVEN GRASZ Adp July 2021 [5060884] [21-2397] (BNW) [Entered: 08/02/2021 11:02 AM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Steven M. Colloton, Jane Kelly, L. Steven Grasz in St. Louis [5060880] [21-2397] (BNW) [Entered: 08/02/2021 11:00 AM] |
| UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 21-2397: In Forma Pauperis] [5055080] [21-2397] (CAH) [Entered: 07/15/2021 10:51 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM filed by Appellant Mr. Justin Paul Sulzner w/service 07/09/2021 by USCA8. [5053363] [21-2397] (BNW) [Entered: 07/09/2021 11:42 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of district court order of 06/28/2021 granting ifp for both appeals. [5050213] [21-2397, 21-2395] (CAH) [Entered: 06/29/2021 02:18 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, order 6/3/21, judgment 6/3/21. [5048621] [21-2397] (CAH) [Entered: 06/24/2021 12:47 PM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5048617] [21-2397] (CAH) [Entered: 06/24/2021 12:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
