Sanchez Torello v. Corizon Medical Services, et al
| Sanchez Torello |
| Corizon Medical Services and Ashok Kumar Chada, Dr. |
| 21-2814 |
| August 12, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 21-2814: due] [5074832] [21-2814] (CMD) [Entered: 09/10/2021 08:35 AM] |
| JUDGE ORDER: Appellants motion to Modify Dismissal of Appeal is granted, and that portion of the Courts September 1, 2021 order assessing the full $505 appellate and docketing fees is vacated, as is the portion of the order remanding the collection of those fees to the district court. Any fees for this appeal which have been collected to date should be returned to the appellant. [ # 5072173-2 ] Adp Sep 2021 [5074006] [21-2814] (CMD) [Entered: 09/08/2021 11:52 AM] |
| MOTION To modify judgment to strike assessment of fee filed by Appellant Mr. Sanchez Torello w/service by USCA8 09/01/2021. [5072173] [21-2814] (CMD) [Entered: 09/01/2021 03:48 PM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - Granting [ # 5069977-2 ] motion to dismiss case filed by Appellant Mr. Sanchez Torello. The case is dismissed in accordance with Rule 42(b), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Mandate shall issue forthwith. The full $505 appellate and docketing fees are assessed against the appellant. The court remands the collection of those fees to the district court. [5070086] [21-2814] This judgment has been modified by order dated 9/8/2021 to vacate the assessment of the fee. --[Edited 09/08/2021 by CMD] (CMD) [Entered: 08/26/2021 04:03 PM] |
| MANDATE ISSUED. [5070093] [21-2814] (CMD) [Entered: 08/26/2021 04:07 PM] |
| MOTION to dismiss case, filed by Appellant Mr. Sanchez Torello w/service by USCA8 08/26/2021. [5069977] [21-2814] (CMD) [Entered: 08/26/2021 02:41 PM] |
| CORPORATE disclosure statement filed by Appellee Corizon Medical Services. - FOR CAL [5066378] [21-2814] (JTE) [Entered: 08/17/2021 01:38 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by J. Thaddeus Eckenrode for Appellees Corizon Medical Services and Ashok Kumar Chada w/service 08/17/2021 [5066374] [21-2814] (JTE) [Entered: 08/17/2021 01:36 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Order 7/26/21, Order 8/12/21, docket entries, [5065039] [21-2814] (AEV) [Entered: 08/12/2021 01:43 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 09/09/2021, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5065041] [21-2814] (AEV) [Entered: 08/12/2021 01:44 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5065046] [21-2814] (AEV) [Entered: 08/12/2021 01:46 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5065033] [21-2814] (AEV) [Entered: 08/12/2021 01:38 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
