Michael Gardner v. Joe Page, et al
| Michael Valentine Gardner |
| Joe Page, III, Warden, Grimes Unit, ADC, Dallan Brownfield, Sgt., Grimes Unit, ADC, Joshua Jones, C/O; Corporal, Grimes Unit, ADC, Dexter Payne, Director, ADC, Kenny Davis, Deputy Warden, Grimes Unit, ADC, Rory Griffin, Deputy Director, Health Correction Service, Kenny Cantrell, Captain, Grimes Unit, ADC and Lewis Young, Major of Security, Grimes Unit, ADC |
| 21-2835 |
| August 17, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JUDGMENT FILED - This case is summarily affirmed in accordance with Eighth Circuit Rule 47A, but the dismissal is modified to be without prejudice. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis has been considered and is granted [ # 5068776-2 ]. The full $505 appellate and docketing fees are assessed against the appellant. Appellant will be permitted to pay the fee by installment method contained in 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915(b)(2). The court remands the calculation of the installments and the collection of the fees to the district court. RAYMOND W. GRUENDER, DUANE BENTON and RALPH R. ERICKSON Adp Oct 2021 [5084475] [21-2835]--[Edited to correct modification language. NDA resent. 10/06/2021 by MVP] (MVP) [Entered: 10/06/2021 11:04 AM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Raymond W. Gruender, Duane Benton, Ralph R. Erickson in St. Louis [5084451] [21-2835] (MVP) [Entered: 10/06/2021 10:53 AM] |
| LETTER notifying court some of his documentation is missing and requesting copies. Letter sent in response, with copies of documents. [5077459] [21-2835]--[Edited 09/21/2021 by CAH to correct event] (CAH) [Entered: 09/16/2021 03:44 PM] |
| DOCUMENT FILED - Copy of district court pleadings filed by Mr. Michael Valentine Gardner. w/service 08/24/2021 [5068789] [21-2835] (CAH) [Entered: 08/24/2021 12:27 PM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Party Mr. Michael Valentine Gardner w/service 08/24/2021. [5068776] [21-2835] (CAH) [Entered: 08/24/2021 12:13 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Proposed Findings 7/8/21, order 8/3/21, judgment 8/3/21, order 8/17/21. [5066271] [21-2835] (CAH) [Entered: 08/17/2021 11:11 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 09/14/2021, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5066272] [21-2835] (CAH) [Entered: 08/17/2021 11:14 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5066273] [21-2835] (CAH) [Entered: 08/17/2021 11:16 AM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5066269] [21-2835] (CAH) [Entered: 08/17/2021 11:09 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
