Santos Munguia v. Merrick B. Garland
| Santos Jeovany Munguia |
| Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States |
| 21-2843 |
| August 17, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Santos Munguia v. Merrick B. Garland |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Administrative Record due 09/27/2021. Appendix due on 10/12/2021. Brief of Santos Jeovany Munguia due on 10/12/2021. Responsive brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief.[5066666] [21-2843] (ASL) [Entered: 08/18/2021 09:57 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Brendan P. Hogan for Respondent Merrick B. Garland w/service 08/18/2021 [5066955] [21-2843] (BPH) [Entered: 08/18/2021 03:51 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: Directing Mr. Carl H. McIntyre for Merrick B. Garland to file a response to motion for stay, [ # 5066643-2 ]. Merrick B. Garland response due on 08/30/2021 [5066648] [21-2843] (ASL) [Entered: 08/18/2021 09:49 AM] |
| MOTION for stay of removal, filed by Attorney Mr. Khanh Ngoc Nguyen for Petitioner Santos Jeovany Munguia w/service 08/18/2021. [5066643] [21-2843] (ASL) [Entered: 08/18/2021 09:38 AM] |
| PETITION for Review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Rec'd by MAIL) filed by Petitioner Santos Jeovany Munguia w/service 08/16/2021. [5066630] [21-2843] (ASL) [Entered: 08/18/2021 09:25 AM] |
| Agency case docketed [5066618] [21-2843] (ASL) [Entered: 08/18/2021 09:12 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
