Cornelius Paige v. Dexter Payne
Petitioner: Cornelius Paige
Respondent: Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Case Number: 21-2848
Filed: August 18, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 18, 2021 MOTION for Permission to file a Successive Habeas Petition with memorandum in support; Response of Dexter Payne due 09/01/2021 (Electronic), filed by Petitioner Mr. Cornelius Paige. [5066945] [21-2848] (AEV) [Entered: 08/18/2021 03:38 PM]
August 18, 2021 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [5066943] [21-2848] (AEV) [Entered: 08/18/2021 03:37 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Cornelius Paige v. Dexter Payne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Cornelius Paige
Represented By: Robert L. Sirianni Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Represented By: Leslie Carol Rutledge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?