David Schied v. U-Haul International, Inc., et al
| David Schied, one of the Sovereign American People; a totally and permanently disabled RECENT QUAD-AMPUTEE; CRIME VICTIM; Common Law and Civil Rights sui juris GRIEVANT/CLAIMANT BENEFICIARY |
| U-Haul International, Inc. and Does, #1-20 |
| 21-2873 |
| August 23, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Raymond W. Gruender, Duane Benton, Ralph R. Erickson in St. Louis [5084187] [21-2873] (CRJ) [Entered: 10/05/2021 04:03 PM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - This case is summarily affirmed in accordance with Eighth Circuit Rule 47A(a). RAYMOND W. GRUENDER, DUANE BENTON and RALPH R. ERICKSON Adp Oct 2021 [5084191] [21-2873] (CRJ) [Entered: 10/05/2021 04:06 PM] |
| BRIEF FILED - APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. David Schied. w/service 09/23/2021 , Length: 11,690 words The court has received and filed appellant's brief. Because no briefing schedule has been established, the appellant's brief is premature. Until a briefing schedule is established, no appellee responsive brief is due at this time. [5079853] [21-2873] (CRJ) [Entered: 09/23/2021 09:19 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5068077] [21-2873] (ASL) [Entered: 08/23/2021 10:23 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Order of 8/2/2021, Judgment of 8/2/2021, Order of 8/19/2021, and docket entries, [5068052] [21-2873] (ASL) [Entered: 08/23/2021 09:54 AM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5068039] [21-2873] (ASL) [Entered: 08/23/2021 09:30 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: David Schied v. U-Haul International, Inc., et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: David Schied, one of the Sovereign American People; a totally and permanently disabled RECENT QUAD-AMPUTEE; CRIME VICTIM; Common Law and Civil Rights sui juris GRIEVANT/CLAIMANT BENEFICIARY | |
| Represented By: | David Schied |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: U-Haul International, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Does, #1-20 | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
