Jonathan Edwards, et al v. Skylift, Inc.
| Jonathan Edwards and Carla Edwards |
| Skylift, Inc. |
| 21-2984 |
| September 2, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Jonathan Edwards v. Skylift, Inc.
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Certificate of transcript filed by Appellants Ms. Carla Edwards and Mr. Jonathan Edwards. No Transcript[5076166] [21-2984] (RMP) [Entered: 09/14/2021 11:05 AM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file brief until 11/12/2021, filed by Attorney Mr. Robert M.N. Palmer for Appellants Ms. Carla Edwards and Mr. Jonathan Edwards w/service 09/14/2021. [5076196] [21-2984] (RMP) [Entered: 09/14/2021 11:19 AM] |
| On December 1, 2016, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure were amended to require a certificate of compliance for motions filed under [Rule 27], certifying that the document complies with the type-volume limitations and stating the number of words in the document. Your recently filed motion did not contain this certificate of compliance. No action will be taken on your motion for extension of time to file brief, [ # 5076196-2 ], submitted by Mr. Robert M.N. Palmer in 21-2984 , pending the filing of a certificate of compliance using the 'Certificate of Compliance' event. Please do not refile your motion [21-2984] (CRJ) [Entered: 09/14/2021 12:29 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 5076196-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Mr. Robert M.N. Palmer. Brief of Carla Edwards and Jonathan Edwards due 11/12/2021. Appendix due on 11/12/2021. [5076594] [21-2984] (CRJ) [Entered: 09/14/2021 04:10 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE filed by Attorney Mr. Robert M.N. Palmer for Appellants Ms. Carla Edwards and Mr. Jonathan Edwards correcting [ # 5076196-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Attorney. [5076400] [21-2984] (RMP) [Entered: 09/14/2021 02:17 PM] |
| CORPORATE disclosure statement filed by Appellee Skylift, Inc.. - FOR CAL [5074921] [21-2984] (JET) [Entered: 09/10/2021 09:59 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Thomas H. Wyatt for Appellee Skylift, Inc. w/service 09/10/2021 [5074919] [21-2984] (THW) [Entered: 09/10/2021 09:54 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by John E. Tull III for Appellee Skylift, Inc. w/service 09/10/2021 [5074912] [21-2984] (JET) [Entered: 09/10/2021 09:51 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Darling, William W. for Appellee Skylift, Inc. w/service 09/08/2021 [5073999] [21-2984]--[Edited 09/08/2021 by CRJ. APP FORM IS FOR AN INTERVENOR. THE FORM HAS BEEN LOCKED AND COUNSEL WILL BE FILING A MOTION TO INTERVENE.] (KMM) [Entered: 09/08/2021 11:45 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Robert M.N. Palmer for Appellants Ms. Carla Edwards and Mr. Jonathan Edwards w/service 09/07/2021 [5073523] [21-2984] (RMP) [Entered: 09/07/2021 01:10 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by James Ryan Fowler for Appellants Ms. Carla Edwards and Mr. Jonathan Edwards w/service 09/07/2021 [5073529] [21-2984] (RMP) [Entered: 09/07/2021 01:14 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order and Judgment both filed 8/12/2021 and Order filed 8/30/2021. [5072693] [21-2984] (CMH) [Entered: 09/02/2021 04:15 PM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Appendix due on 10/12/2021. BRIEF OF APPELLANT Carla Edwards and Jonathan Edwards due 10/12/2021. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5072696] [21-2984] (CMH) [Entered: 09/02/2021 04:16 PM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5072690] [21-2984] (CMH) [Entered: 09/02/2021 04:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
