Piper Partridge, et al v. City of Benton, Arkansas, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: Piper Partridge, Individually as mother and next of kin to Keagan Schweikle and as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Keagan Schweikle and Dominic Schweikle, Individually as father and next of kin to Keagan Schweikle
Defendant / Appellee: City of Benton, Arkansas, Kyle Ellison, Individually and as Employee of City of Benton, Arkansas, Kirk Lane, Individually and as Employee of City of Benton, Arkansas and John Does, 1-20, Individually and as Employees of City of Benton, Arkansas
Case Number: 21-3001
Filed: September 7, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 12, 2023 Summary Piper Partridge v. City of Benton, Arkansas

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2021 BRIEF FILED - APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Piper Partridge and Dominic Schweikle. w/service 11/05/2021 , Length: 27 pages 10 COPIES OF PAPER BRIEFS (WITHOUT THE APPELLATE PDF FOOTER) FROM Piper Partridge and Dominic Schweikle due 11/10/2021 WITH certificate of service for paper briefs. Brief of City of Benton, Arkansas, John Does, Kyle Ellison and Kirk Lane due on 12/06/2021 [5094696] [21-3001] (NDG) [Entered: 11/05/2021 11:23 AM]
November 3, 2021 APPELLANT brief of Piper Partridge and Dominic Schweikle submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [5094031] [21-3001] (MJG) [Entered: 11/03/2021 05:29 PM]
November 2, 2021 ADDENDUM of APPELLANTS FILED by Appellants Piper Partridge and Dominic Schweikle w/service 11/02/2021 [5093073] [21-3001] (NDG) [Entered: 11/02/2021 10:02 AM]
November 2, 2021 Brief deficiency notice sent to counsel, Attorney Mr. Mark John Geragos for Appellants Piper Partridge and Dominic Schweikle. [5093068] [21-3001] (NDG) [Entered: 11/02/2021 09:54 AM]
November 1, 2021 Addendum of APPELLANT submitted for review by Piper Partridge and Dominic Schweikle. To open/view this addendum, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. [5092977] [21-3001] (MJG) [Entered: 11/01/2021 08:25 PM]
November 1, 2021 APPELLANT brief of Piper Partridge and Dominic Schweikle submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [5092976] [21-3001] (MJG) [Entered: 11/01/2021 08:24 PM]
October 20, 2021 CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 5088606-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Mr. Mark John Geragos. Brief of Piper Partridge and Dominic Schweikle due 11/01/2021. Appendix due on 11/01/2021. [5089140] [21-3001] (NDG) [Entered: 10/20/2021 08:39 AM]
October 19, 2021 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE filed by Attorney Mr. Mark John Geragos for Appellants Piper Partridge and Dominic Schweikle correcting [ # 5088606-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Attorney. [5088947] [21-3001] (MJG) [Entered: 10/19/2021 02:28 PM]
October 19, 2021 On December 1, 2016, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure were amended to require a certificate of compliance for motions filed under Rule 27, certifying that the document complies with the type-volume limitations and stating the number of words in the document. Your recently filed motion did not contain this certificate of compliance. No action will be taken on your motion for extension of time to file brief, [ # 5088606-2 ], submitted by Mr. Mark John Geragos in 21-3001 , pending the filing of a certificate of compliance using the 'Certificate of Compliance' event. Please do not refile your motion [21-3001] (NDG) [Entered: 10/19/2021 10:25 AM]
October 18, 2021 MOTION for extension of time to file brief until 11/01/2021, filed by Attorney Mr. Mark John Geragos for Appellants Piper Partridge and Dominic Schweikle w/service 10/18/2021. [5088606] [21-3001] (MJG) [Entered: 10/18/2021 07:06 PM]
September 21, 2021 METHOD of appendix preparation filed by Appellants Piper Partridge and Dominic Schweikle - Joint Appendix - w/service 09/21/2021 [5079013] [21-3001] (MJG) [Entered: 09/21/2021 02:02 PM]
September 16, 2021 STATEMENT of issues filed by Appellants Dominic Schweikle and Piper Partridge - w/service 09/16/2021. [5077506] [21-3001] (MJG) [Entered: 09/16/2021 08:41 PM]
September 16, 2021 Certificate of transcript filed by Appellants Piper Partridge and Dominic Schweikle. No Transcript[5077505] [21-3001] (MJG) [Entered: 09/16/2021 08:32 PM]
September 8, 2021 Opinion or Order APPEARANCE filed by Richard Holiman for Appellants Piper Partridge and Dominic Schweikle w/service 09/08/2021 [5074259] [21-3001] (MJG) [Entered: 09/08/2021 04:24 PM]
September 8, 2021 Opinion or Order APPEARANCE filed by Setara Qassim for Appellants Piper Partridge and Dominic Schweikle w/service 09/08/2021 [5074255] [21-3001] (MJG) [Entered: 09/08/2021 04:21 PM]
September 8, 2021 Opinion or Order APPEARANCE filed by Mark J. Geragos for Appellants Dominic Schweikle and Piper Partridge w/service 09/08/2021 [5074253] [21-3001] (MJG) [Entered: 09/08/2021 04:19 PM]
September 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order 08/30/2021, and Judgment 08/30/2021.[5073440] [21-3001] (CJO) [Entered: 09/07/2021 11:01 AM]
September 7, 2021 Opinion or Order UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 21-3001: paid - cs] [5073719] [21-3001] (CJO) [Entered: 09/07/2021 04:10 PM]
September 7, 2021 Opinion or Order DOCUMENT FILED - Receipt: Filing Fee Paid to District Court. [5073714] [21-3001] (CJO) [Entered: 09/07/2021 04:09 PM]
September 7, 2021 Opinion or Order APPEARANCE filed by Gabrielle Gibson for Appellees City of Benton, Arkansas, Kyle Ellison and Kirk Lane w/service 09/07/2021 [5073632] [21-3001] (GDG) [Entered: 09/07/2021 02:51 PM]
September 7, 2021 Opinion or Order APPEARANCE filed by Jenna Adams for Appellees City of Benton, Arkansas, Kyle Ellison and Kirk Lane w/service 09/07/2021 [5073627] [21-3001] (JAA) [Entered: 09/07/2021 02:49 PM]
September 7, 2021 Opinion or Order BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Appendix due on 10/18/2021. BRIEF OF APPELLANT Piper Partridge and Dominic Schweikle due 10/18/2021. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5073441] [21-3001] (CJO) [Entered: 09/07/2021 11:02 AM]
September 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Civil case docketed. [5073430] [21-3001] (CJO) [Entered: 09/07/2021 10:54 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Piper Partridge, et al v. City of Benton, Arkansas, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Piper Partridge, Individually as mother and next of kin to Keagan Schweikle and as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Keagan Schweikle
Represented By: Mark John Geragos
Represented By: Richard Eugene Holiman
Represented By: Setara Qassim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Dominic Schweikle, Individually as father and next of kin to Keagan Schweikle
Represented By: Mark John Geragos
Represented By: Richard Eugene Holiman
Represented By: Setara Qassim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: City of Benton, Arkansas
Represented By: Jenna Allison Adams
Represented By: Gabrielle Denise Gibson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Kyle Ellison, Individually and as Employee of City of Benton, Arkansas
Represented By: Jenna Allison Adams
Represented By: Gabrielle Denise Gibson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Kirk Lane, Individually and as Employee of City of Benton, Arkansas
Represented By: Jenna Allison Adams
Represented By: Gabrielle Denise Gibson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: John Does, 1-20, Individually and as Employees of City of Benton, Arkansas
Represented By: Russell A. Wood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?