William Vaughn v. State of Missouri, et al
| William Vaughn, also known as Mosias |
| State of Missouri, Saint Louis County, Saint Louis County Council, Saint Louis County Department of Revenue, Saint Louis County Collector of Revenue, Saint louis County Assessor, Michael L. Parson, Missouri Governor, Sam Page, St. Louis County Council (Executive), Rita Heard Days, St. Louis County Council (D-1st District), Kelli Dunaway, St. Louis County Council (D-2nd District), Tim Fitch, St. Louis County council (R-3rd District), Rochelle Gray, St. Louis County Council (D-4th District), Lisa Clancy, St. Louis County Council (D-5th District), Ernie Trakas, St. Louis County Council (R-6th District), Mark Harder, St. Louis County Council (R-7th District), Kenny Murdock, St. Louis County Council (Director of Diversity, et al.), Gerard Hollins, St. Louis County Director of Revenue, Mark R. Devore, St. Louis County Collector of Revenue, Jake Zimmerman, St. Louis County Assessor, Gregory F. Quinn, Former St. Louis County Director of Revenue, Eugene K. Leung, Former St. Louis County Director of Revenue, Circuit Court of St. Louis county, DS REO LLC, Daniel Stehr, Mondonna Ghasdei, St. Louis County Associate Circuit Judge, Joan M. Gilmer, St. Louis County Circuit Clerk and Dale Sweet, Attorney of Sweet Law Office |
| 21-3088 |
| September 17, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JUDGMENT FILED - Appellant has failed to respond to the show cause order of October 14, 2021 and the time for a response has expired. This appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Mandate shall issue forthwith. [5094817] [21-3088] (BNW) [Entered: 11/05/2021 12:51 PM] |
| MANDATE ISSUED. [5094820] [21-3088] (BNW) [Entered: 11/05/2021 12:53 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:APPELLANT has failed to pay to the Clerk of the District Court the requisite docketing fees. APPELLANT is directed to show cause within 14 days why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Response of William Vaughn due 10/28/2021 [5087141] [21-3088] (CAH) [Entered: 10/14/2021 11:19 AM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5077643] [21-3088] (CAH) [Entered: 09/17/2021 10:44 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, memorandum & order 8/18/21, dismissal order 8/18/21, order 8/24/21. [5077648] [21-3088] (CAH) [Entered: 09/17/2021 10:49 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within 21 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 10/08/2021, a show cause order will be entered directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. [5077652] [21-3088] (CAH) [Entered: 09/17/2021 10:53 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.