United States v. Robert Evans
| United States of America |
| Robert Carey Evans |
| 21-3114 |
| September 21, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CRIMINAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: PSI report due 10/08/2021. Brief of appellant Robert Carey Evans due 10/22/2021. Appellee(s) brief is due 21 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellant(s) brief. Appellant reply brief is due 7 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellee's brief. [5079464] [21-3114] (MMH) [Entered: 09/22/2021 11:42 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:This criminal appeal involves child pornography. In accordance with the provisions of 18 U.S.C. Section 3509(d)(2) regarding confidentiality of information and privacy protection, all papers filed with this court which disclose the name of or any information concerning a child shall be sealed. (SEE order for complete details) [5079433] [21-3114] (MMH) [Entered: 09/22/2021 11:30 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The Federal Public Defender is hereby appointed to represent appellant in this case. [5079431] [21-3114] (MMH) [Entered: 09/22/2021 11:27 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, and Order Granting Motion to Turn Over Funds from Inmate Trust Account 9/2/21 [5079427] [21-3114] (MMH) [Entered: 09/22/2021 11:26 AM] |
| CRIMINAL case docketed. [5079416] [21-3114] (MMH) [Entered: 09/22/2021 11:17 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
