Darrell Dennis v. Dexter Payne
| Darrell Dennis |
| Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction (originally named as Dexter Paine) |
| 21-3284 |
| October 13, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPLICATION for Certificate of Appealability, w/ supportive documents, filed by Appellant Mr. Darrell Dennis w/service 11/16/2021. [5098049] [21-3284]--[Edited 11/23/2021 by CAH to change event from motion to application] (CAH) [Entered: 11/16/2021 12:43 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: The district court has denied appellant a certificate of appealability. Appellant may file an application for a certificate of appealability in this court. The motion to separate the notice of appeal and amended notice of appeal as two separate appeals is denied. [ # 5092901-2 ] [5093178] [21-3284] (CAH) [Entered: 11/02/2021 11:21 AM] |
| MOTION for temporary stay of appellate procedures, filed by Appellant Mr. Darrell Dennis w/service 11/01/2021. [5092901] [21-3284] (CAH) [Entered: 11/01/2021 03:39 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, amended notice of appeal, docket entries, recommended disposition 7/29/21, order 8/23/21, judgment 8/23/21, order 9/10/21, docket text order 9/21/21. . [5088716] [21-3284] (CAH) [Entered: 10/19/2021 10:08 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Pamela Rumpz for Appellee Dexter Payne w/service 10/13/2021 [5086887] [21-3284] (PR) [Entered: 10/13/2021 03:46 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Recommended Disposition 7/29/21, order 7/30/21, order 8/23/21, judgment 8/23/21, docket text orders of 9/2/21, 9/7/21, 9/7/21 and 9/21/21, order 9/10/21. [5086436] [21-3284] (CAH) [Entered: 10/13/2021 09:36 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5086437] [21-3284] (CAH) [Entered: 10/13/2021 09:37 AM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5086434] [21-3284] (CAH) [Entered: 10/13/2021 09:33 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Darrell Dennis v. Dexter Payne | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Darrell Dennis | |
| Represented By: | Darrell Dennis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction (originally named as Dexter Paine) | |
| Represented By: | Pamela Rumpz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
