Alexander Palomarez v. Warden Doug Clark
| Alexander Schroder Palomarez |
| Warden Doug Clark |
| 21-3335 |
| October 18, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION for Permission to file a Successive Habeas Petition Response of Doug Clark due 11/01/2021 (Rec'd by MAIL), filed by Petitioner Mr. Alexander Schroder Palomarez w/service 10/13/2021. [5088202] [21-3335] (MMH) [Entered: 10/18/2021 11:14 AM] |
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [5088188] [21-3335] (MMH) [Entered: 10/18/2021 11:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Alexander Palomarez v. Warden Doug Clark | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Alexander Schroder Palomarez | |
| Represented By: | Alexander Schroder Palomarez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Doug Clark | |
| Represented By: | Sarah Thorne |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
