Jonathan Ramos v. Valmont Industries, et al
| John W. Smith |
| Jonathan F. Ramos |
| Valmont Industries, Inc., Angie Wright, Tim Kennedy and Kevin Strudthoff |
| 21-3401 |
| October 26, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MEMORANDUM of Appellant Mr. Jonathan F. Ramos in support of originating court document notice of appeal, , Doc No. [ # 5090897-2 ]. w/service 11/18/2021. [5099151] [21-3401] (AEV) [Entered: 11/18/2021 12:09 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5090902] [21-3401] (AEV) [Entered: 10/26/2021 09:31 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Memorandum and Order 9/30/21, Judgment 9/30/21, Memorandum and Order 10/25/21, docket entries, [5090897] [21-3401] (AEV) [Entered: 10/26/2021 09:29 AM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5090893] [21-3401] (AEV) [Entered: 10/26/2021 09:26 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
